Why did he have to run home to be safe from being shot?
IMO, Martin did not have to run home that night. His mistake was punching someone out. That is against the law.
Even a child knows that.
Why did he have to run home to be safe from being shot?
I've shot that type of gun before, and the recoil wasn't bad at all. Zimmerman is bigger than me, it should have been easy to handle.
My opinion of course. :twocents::twocents::twocents:
I think the gunshot gun recoiled caused Zimmerman's injuries, not the victim.
Zimmerman started the drive to the store without a bashed up face, he is seen on the bottom of a fight, he got up from the ground with a bashed up face.
All we know is Martin confronted him, and Martin likes to fight.
Unless someone has some proof that Zimmerman attacked Martin, which would have beeen presented if it existed, it must be considered self defense.
Honestly, if I was punched by someone, I would do whatever I could to stop the attack. The majority of people would fight back.
MOO :twocents:
I think the gunshot gun recoiled caused Zimmerman's injuries, not the victim.
Well, his injuries were pretty minor. It wouldn't be that hard to bang yourself up a little without being clearly seen. In the dark. MOO
Not saying GZ did that, because honestly he wasn't that badly hurt so his injuries don't really support self-defense anyway. No TM dna on the gun either. MOO
No it has to prove that he murdered him with ill will yada yada yada, it is the defense who has to prove self defense IMO
TM didn't have any injuries.Can you point to any evidence that proves TM was instigator?
How do we know that RZ didn't confront TM and that TM got the upper hand?
TM may have been in great fear of bodily harm or death because GZ (a stranger) was following him, questioning him, harassing him.
That GZ was following him, questioning him are facts in evidence in this case.
TM may have thrown the first punch because he was scared.
Self-defense. Same law applies.
IMO, GZ more likely than not showed a glimpse of his gun to try to force TM to wait with him.
There is zero evidence that GZ did NOT threaten TMM...if fact we know he was following and questioning him.
wow. are you claiming that BDLR used NO FACTS/EVIDENCE in his closing? really? so much for leaving emotion out and relying solely upon the law!
MOO
OT
I can't believe O'Mara has the nerve to bring Trayvon's family into his closing. JMO. It upsets me.
I wasn't actually pertaining my quote to this but to another posters reply to a post I posted :blushing:
However, this fight between TM and GZ, NO ONE saw it from the beginning, no one. GZ played a part in the death of a unarmed teen and it needs to be explained and yet no one knows who started it. So we are going by what GZ claims happened.
TM may have been in great fear of bodily harm or death because GZ (a stranger) was following him, questioning him, harassing him.
That GZ was following him, questioning him are facts in evidence in this case.
TM may have thrown the first punch because he was scared.
Self-defense. Same law applies.
IMO, GZ more likely than not showed a glimpse of his gun to try to force TM to wait with him.
There is zero evidence that GZ did NOT threaten TMM...if fact we know he was following and questioning him.
There was a female witness that testified she saw someone wearing red on top. Was that testimony thrown out? IMO