Yes, and this case is a lovely example of that. MOO
Well, maybe NOW people will give second thought to assaulting people in the dark....they might have a gun!!
IMO
Yes, and this case is a lovely example of that. MOO
No evidence at all that this happened. Not even close. Not even from Rachel.
Of course there's circumstantial evidence. Why would someone attack another person while yelling "get off, get off?" That makes zero sense. So that indicates right there that GZ may have started the altercation.
As far as direct evidence, there's also no direct evidence that TM attacked GZ first. Failing to prove this doesn't mean the state has failed entirely. It simply means no one knows for certain who started the altercation. But we do know who instigated it, who pursued, who armed himself with deadly force, and who used that force against an unarmed teenager. If self-defense, it's still imperfect self-defense, and that means manslaughter. IMO, that means jail time for GZ. I find it incredibly difficult to believe that a jury wouldn't hold him accountable for his irresponsible actions that night.
A force hitting you in the face will slam your head backwards into the ground.
defense witness testifies a bump on the head can kill you, and cut your skin on a hard flat surface. I believe his head hit the water cover, or even his flashlight in the grass, or rock in the grass, or just the dirt.
I don't believe that TM was yelling 'get off'. Several witnesses confirmed GZ was the one screaming ont he 911 call.
The State has to prove that GZ assaulted TM first. If not, there is no case for murder or manslaughter. That's the law.
JMO
:twocents: IF I see someone suspicious on "my turf" I'm going to investigate immediately ...
I strongly support the RIGHT to defend myself ... and usually, when "something happens," LE is usually not around to see it ...
JMO but IF I'm in danger, I'm going to do what I have to do to defend myself AND defend myself with a weapon of MY choice ... I'm not going to wait for LE to show up because I could be "gone" by that time ...
IN MY OPINION ... MOO ... JMO !
:moo:
Your turf?
IMO
She was already off the phone. She wasn't there.
No evidence Trayvon touched or punched GZ face.
The gun isn't big enough to cause multiple cuts on the back of his head, and the side of his head, split his lip, cause damage to the side of his mouth, split his lip on the front of his mouth, and break his nose.He got right up after the shot- recoil.
That's why blood runs down, not back from any punch to the face.
Which no evidence on Trayvon's hands proves Trayvon didn't make that injury on his face. What did? No punch to the face, no attack.
Everyone embellishes. I've done it plenty of times. I'm not a murderer, just a man. IMO
Great bodily injury? I got beat up more at the dentist. IMO
I don't believe that TM was yelling 'get off'. Several witnesses confirmed GZ was the one screaming ont he 911 call.
The State has to prove that GZ assaulted TM first. If not, there is no case for murder or manslaughter. That's the law.
JMO
Please link it...unless that is your opinion.
I wrote down her exact words last night. She said ALMOST by his Daddy's fiance's house when being questioned by Bernie, right before her testimony of GET OFF. JMO
Great bodily injury? I got beat up more at the dentist. IMO
I agree, even in his walk through all I see are two bandages, nothing more. I see no swelling, no black and blue bruises, he's up walking and talking not in the hospital bed or even in his own bed with a major headache, but able to go to school and focus on his studies. I don't get it????? My own husband fell on our concrete steps, just once his face hit the steps and he ended up in the emergency, face swollen, black and blue bruises all around his eyes, broken tooth and was in bed the next day in pain and he only hit once, not multiple times like GZ claims. I don't get it.
And if he did kill Zimmerman, he could have argued that he was standing his ground. FL laws seem to work that way. Whoever wins a fight could argue self-defense.
I understand - but object to the someone starting a fight, then finds they are losing - then uses deadly force.Then claims self defense.
Stay in your truck George - you were considered unfit and obese.
IMO
Yes I have heard that used in that way,but in this case there was a concern from RJ and TM that GZ may have been a pervert and that was why he was watching Trayvon.