This is becoming off-topic, so I don't want to continue this conversation too much longer, but as a devout Christian if I were in a crisis and noticed the police/emt/nurse/whoever wearing a religious symbol I might try to connect in that way. If I saw someone wearing a cross or a "fishers of men" bracelet or some other exclusively Christian artifact, I might reach out to them and even ask for a prayer.
It will probably come out in court whether GZ is a devout Catholic, I don't know. But it's common for Christians to embrace one another in tragedy and although some people feel that religious beliefs are strictly personal and shouldn't be discussed, I wouldn't assume that of a person who is publicly wearing a symbol of my religion.
Not in the area where GZ says TM would have come out of. You can see the size of the bushes on the reenactment video. They were too small for a 5'11 young man to hide behind, imo.
Two subjects I avoid, especially with someone not familiar to me, is religion and politics. I certainly wouldn't ask a complete stranger about their religious beliefs on the basis of a piece of jewellry they're wearing. JMHO though.
It's common in your opinion.
I wouldn't either, especially after I just shot someone. I would think you wouldn't be making small talk under these circumstance. But heck, that's just how I think I would behave after killing someone. Thank goodness I will never be in GZ's position. I would have reported it and let LE do their job!
Listening to this witness I am struck with the same thoughts, The evidence in the case backs up GZ. There is a lot of suppositions that are made to get it to where the opposite is true.. If you believe that TM was the one who was attacked, you have to just make it up in your head.
There is evidence that GZ was beaten. I just don't see how to get around that. JMHO
Why did GZ report that Trayvon walked through the houses to this officer? No mention of running.
IMO - someone who changes their story is not telling the truth.
I can't say one way or another how the fight started and who started it. There's no definitive evidence. There is only evidence that at some point Trayvon got the upper hand. That is not evidence that Trayvon attacked first. And I believe, regardless, that George should at least be held accountable for his actions that night that led to the encounter.
The case can certainly be made that someone who doesn't change their story at ALL is actually lying.
If you go through a tragic event, and describe it exactly the same, with the same words each time, I've seen police state in other cases where that's likely to be a lie. They question over and over and over to try to get a little bit different description, a little different word choice.
Because that's how memory works. It's a visual recalling, not a verbal script.
So MOM goes to get photos and the leo adds to her testimony there are bushes around units with a/c units also. lol imo
Nothing he did was against the law. Right? He is not charged with anything but Murder and the less included of MS right?
Why did GZ report that Trayvon walked through the houses to this officer? No mention of running.
IMO - someone who changes their story is not telling the truth.