Dhighsmith
SouthGA
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2017
- Messages
- 687
- Reaction score
- 5,729
Absolutely agree with your statements. I’m hopeful even more advances in DNA testing will help solve many more cold cases that’s been awaiting justice.Hence why it's important that everything is documented at every stage - collection, processing, interpretation. What they did, how they did it, how they arrived at the result they did. They're going to be asked on the stand to show their work, so they'd better be able to.
She's behind bars for fraud because the idea she had was never viable, they never made it work, they fabricated evidence to support their claim it did work, and they took money from a lot of people including the government to 'build' it when they never built anything. I don't think you can compare Elizabeth Holmes and her smoke and mirrors with almost forty years of forensic science using DNA, when what Holmes did was essentially just a modern version of a classic scam that has fleeced many a person of their cash in the last few centuries. Silver mine, anyone? I can get you in on the ground floor.
Don't get me wrong, ANY science can be misused or held up as proof of something it isn't. But there are few things so closely examined as DNA in forensic science right now, except perhaps electronic data interpretation. I don't see DNA falling from grace as hard and fast as Theranos in my lifetime, if ever.
MOO
I’m often too gullible, I want to believe that initially Theranos, maybe not necessarily Holmes herself, started out with good intentions. When research results failed almost from the beginning so did she, all the attention and financial success in excess from the fraudulent concept of a miracle test pulled her deeper into the black hole of evil deception and corruption. To me she shows no remorse or responsibility, continuing to mislead during her testimony- she was never Steve Jobs’ equal more like Kenneth Lay of Enron. JMO.