• #6,001
Has it been reported or made known (yes I might have missed it) - whether or not the separate set of remains attributed to Jane Doe #7 / Karen Vergata were believed to have been deposited in those locations about the same time period? Or was there a known time lapse when they are believed to have been placed in those locations.

As I write this I realize to post this in the other thread for this. MOO
Now that conjures up possibilities . . .
 
  • #6,002
It was even worse than paraphrased. I want to touch base, and if you do, too, call. Very thinly veiled as a colleague call.

MOO

IMO that was absolutely a man who wasn't able to get this colleague out of his mind, and attempted under the guise of a “touch base” call to set up SOME kind of appointment with her.

He was working too hard to affect a light tone, collegial, “hey need to check in with you” when he had no work purpose to contact her.

If I were still her age and got one of those calls, I would definitely think this married man from work is putting the moves on me.

Knowing what we know now, it’s terrifying.

JMO
 
  • #6,003
I think its really interesting that Karen lived close to RHs office. Its just a 15 minute walk or even shorter car ride to her place from his work place. Obviously this are all just assumptions, but if we think he started earlier and not mid/end 40ies , this could be totally connected, even if we probably never will find the proof for it.
Also for what i understand he was divorced in 1995 from his first wife and married his second wife in April 1996, so there is the possibility that he was living alone at that time in his childhood home ?
Do we know when RH Mom passed away? Could she have still been alive and he was living with her? That could have been a stress point.
 
  • #6,004
Do we know when RH Mom passed away? Could she have still been alive and he was living with her? That could have been a stress point.
By all accounts, she's still living
 
  • #6,005
I think at this point, LISK is used like the Redhead Murders... Whether it's one offender or several, it's grouping a series of crimes together by location, date, victim appearance and lifestyle, the signatures of the crime and disposal of victims, and so on in a way to try to make sense of it.

RH is definitely A LISK... but the ONLY LISK? We don't know yet.

MOO
If the competing serial killer theory is confirmed...

...part of the competition will be who gets the title of the 'real' LISK?

MOO
 
  • #6,006
Wasn’t Melissa the first of the G4 girls that they determined had been murdered first? If so, they could be withholding more details if there was something different about the method of killing that was not present with the other three (this is just my thinking). If this is the case, then LE may be withholding that information from the public in order to make sure everything is even more airtight.
BBM

Wow! brilliant. Now you really just gave me hope. Hope that there may be some through-line to a possible deviation in method with MBB that links to other unsolved cases. I realize we have no facts to back it up but it's a wonderful and hopeful thought. And, it's always good to have hope. Thanks!

jmo
 
  • #6,007
By all accounts, she's still living
Oh. That’s right. She ( RH Mom) must be in her 90’s
So did RH, Mom and 1st wife all live together in 1996? Or that near time frame.
That definitely could have been a stress point. Maybe the reason marriage #1 didn’t last.
Also the start of a new business. More stress.
Maybe this was the beginning.
 
  • #6,008
Maureen was killed two years earlier than Melissa.
I thought @SonsOfCain stated Melissa but meant Maureen because obviously RH is already charged in Melissa's death and we were talking about potential charges for Maureen.

It would make sense that there might be something different with Maureen that is causing them to hold back if you consider the theory that these people supposedly evolve over time and hone "their craft".

One can hope.

jmo
 
  • #6,009
It's interesting that SCPD and NYSP haven't addressed if Karen Vergata is a victim of Heuermanns yet Othrams posts here about the identification give the impression that she is indeed.
Interesting. I had not realized that Othrams post here indicates that.

My brain has tumbled around wondering why her name was kept secret and why the Task Force went straight into the secrecy of the Grand Jury almost immediately after her name was learned.

I also kept remembering DA Tierney saying they knew they were being watched, but I couldn't figure out HOW they knew they were being watched.

But he told us in the first Press Conference after RH's arrest.

RH was identified March 14, 2022. Karen Vergata was identified in September and her family notified in October, according to transcript of press conference. It was at that time the Task Force decided to go into the confidentiality/secrecy of the Grand Jury. AND they took Vergata's identity with them.

By that time RH had been a suspect since March 14. They had been executing warrants and collecting into on him. Among the information were his cell phone records. The Task Force knew about his searches for their progress on the case, according to Tierney at the first press conference.

So, does the decision to take Karen Vergata's ID into the Grand Jury with the Gilgo 4 investigation signify they can link her to RH?
 
  • #6,010
I saw this too and this is just completely BAFFLING to me.

Why they did not obtain a warrant to obtain his DNA via Buccal Swab on arrest is confounding. Why did they wait? They'd been tailing his for some time already at that point.

On another note, it solves the mystery surrounding the hearing #623

jmo

That's why I queried what the "motion" for buccal swab was a few days ago...I was confused why they'd be asking for one then

I just assumed they'd have warrant for one on arrest. LE had spent months getting warrants for all cell records, online searches, the properties and just about everything else connected to him...so I was surprised this hasn't been tied up in advance too
 
  • #6,011
Interesting. I had not realized that Othrams post here indicates that.

My brain has tumbled around wondering why her name was kept secret and why the Task Force went straight into the secrecy of the Grand Jury almost immediately after her name was learned.

I also kept remembering DA Tierney saying they knew they were being watched, but I couldn't figure out HOW they knew they were being watched.

But he told us in the first Press Conference after RH's arrest.

RH was identified March 14, 2022. Karen Vergata was identified in September and her family notified in October, according to transcript of press conference. It was at that time the Task Force decided to go into the confidentiality/secrecy of the Grand Jury. AND they took Vergata's identity with them.

By that time RH had been a suspect since March 14. They had been executing warrants and collecting into on him. Among the information were his cell phone records. The Task Force knew about his searches for their progress on the case, according to Tierney at the first press conference.

So, does the decision to take Karen Vergata's ID into the Grand Jury with the Gilgo 4 investigation signify they can link her to RH?
This is completely MOO but I couldn't help but wonder, why would the Task Force wait until after RH's arrest to announce Fire Island Jane Doe (Karen) had been identified unless they believed that doing so would jeopardize their case against RH (i.e., tipping him off because he could possibly be responsible for Karen's death)?
 
  • #6,012
This is completely MOO but I couldn't help but wonder, why would the Task Force wait until after RH's arrest to announce Fire Island Jane Doe (Karen) had been identified unless they believed that doing so would jeopardize their case against RH (i.e., tipping him off because he could possibly be responsible for Karen's death)?

I really like the way your brain works!! ;)
 
  • #6,013
This is completely MOO but I couldn't help but wonder, why would the Task Force wait until after RH's arrest to announce Fire Island Jane Doe (Karen) had been identified unless they believed that doing so would jeopardize their case against RH (i.e., tipping him off because he could possibly be responsible for Karen's death)?

MOO As the DA has alluded to I believe they were controlling the story while observing RH behavior and possible reaction. They did notify family of her ID, which was the correct action.
 
  • #6,014
This is completely MOO but I couldn't help but wonder, why would the Task Force wait until after RH's arrest to announce Fire Island Jane Doe (Karen) had been identified unless they believed that doing so would jeopardize their case against RH (i.e., tipping him off because he could possibly be responsible for Karen's death)?
That’s exactly what I assumed also. Makes the most sense
 
  • #6,015
MOO As the DA has alluded to I believe they were controlling the story while observing RH behavior and possible reaction. They did notify family of her ID, which was the correct action.

Apparently, some members of the family didn't know of her ID until (fairly) recently. It doesn't appear her father knew before his death. My conclusion per some of the recent posts and links on her WS thread.

 
  • #6,016
I realize there’s likely no answer to the situation but this case and so many others as in Robert Pickton from Canada and the recent arrest of man in Reno Nevada brings me back to question of what actions could better protect these women who are obviously at risk constantly from unknown predators?
 
  • #6,017
I realize there’s likely no answer to the situation but this case and so many others as in Robert Pickton from Canada and the recent arrest of man in Reno Nevada brings me back to question of what actions could better protect these women who are obviously at risk constantly from unknown predators?
My answer doesn't really help because it takes a long time and apparently is unrealistic, but the best solution is that men don't prey on victims.

Yes, I know women prey on victims too, so, sure, include them as well.

Don't prey on people, people!

I know, I know, unrealistic.


jmo
 
  • #6,018
Our late great @Foxfire said they can start killing as young as 14-15.

I’ve seen some pretty young budding SKs here over the years.
Going to read post history now. It's always crazy when someone from this forum passes.
 
  • #6,019
My answer doesn't really help because it takes a long time and apparently is unrealistic, but the best solution is that men don't prey on victims.

Yes, I know women prey on victims too, so, sure, include them as well.

Don't prey on people, people!

I know, I know, unrealistic.


jmo
No more unrealistic than me asking my question, you’re are right though as humans we should be better than all this.
 
  • #6,020
This is completely MOO but I couldn't help but wonder, why would the Task Force wait until after RH's arrest to announce Fire Island Jane Doe (Karen) had been identified unless they believed that doing so would jeopardize their case against RH (i.e., tipping him off because he could possibly be responsible for Karen's death)?

I think they just decided not to announce anything Gilgo related in case it spooked him (whether he did it or not) as it would be confirmation investigation work was ongoing.

Conversely, maybe they toyed with making the announcement before the arrest...since they were monitoring his movements LE could see what reaction he made (if any) regarding online searches etc.

Deciding that they had (more than) enough evidence they went for arrest first. We know they intentionally did it away from home and were aware he had guns...so erred on the side of caution - my thoughts
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
154
Guests online
2,089
Total visitors
2,243

Thread Chapters

Forum statistics

Threads
646,088
Messages
18,854,048
Members
245,897
Latest member
KayeeDee1223
Top