• #6,121
‘I’ve thought of that before. Somewhere in these threads I asked if ’hair’ was his ‘tell’. You know like poker players, unknowingly twitch one eye when they’re bluffing, or Idk how to explain it. I’m confused now with all the girls but I thought that around the time msm was talking about a redhead and I thought about his collecting hobbies, that he might have intentionally went after her.
*eta: his ‘tell’ meaning that would be what would get him caught, something about the hair out of place where someone would notice something, maybe like his wife asked him something about a hair, maybe he was being recorded when he replied. I’m sorry, I just don’t know how to put my thoughts into words right now.
rbbm
In an auto biography i recently read, the woman said she knew her husband was having an affair, but as they were close with a wide circle of people, she couldn't figure out which woman was the 'guilty party'.
Until she noticed that one friend in particular had taken to smoking a different brand of cigarettes- the tell- they were the same brand the author's husband smoked. imo. fwiw
 
  • #6,122
  • #6,123
Based on historical patterns, organized killers are likely to be above average to average intelligence, attractive, married or living with a domestic partner, employed, educated, skilled, orderly, cunning and controlled. They have some degree of social grace, may even be charming, and often talk and seduce their victims into being captured.

With organized offenders, there are typically three separate crime scenes: where the victim was approached by the killer, where the victim was killed, and where the victim’s body was disposed of. Organized killers are very difficult to apprehend because they go to inordinate lengths to cover their tracks and often are forensically savvy, meaning they are familiar with police investigation methods. They are likely to follow the news media reports of their crimes and may even correspond with the news media. Ted Bundy, Joel Rifkin, and Dennis Rader are prime examples of organized killers
It's not like a lightswitch, though. All offenders are capable of both disorganised and organised behaviour. Bundy's a good example to point to in that. While a lot of his behaviour was highly organised, he would medicate with alcohol, he would be impulsive, and towards the end, he exhibited decompensation that introduced a lot of uncontrolled, extreme overkill to his crimes, but also probably ensured he got caught.

A crime is a dynamic thing. The difference between if a scene presents as organised and disorganised could come down to intoxication, a passing mental health crisis, if a victim fights or behaves in an unexpected way (like escaping), if the perpetrator is disturbed in the middle of the crime.

We think of killers being meticulous and getting away with it for ages as being clever, but sometimes, it's striking something that works early on and doing it over and over without getting too clever about it, and being lucky enough to not get caught. Gary Ridgway and Samuel Little come to mind.

MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #6,124
It’s been reported that it was camouflage burlap that hunters use, not what we think of as burlap you use in gardening. https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/14/us/gilgo-beach-murders-suspect-arrest/index.html

Looks like the camo burlap for hunters is made from - 100% burlap.
So guessing it could be used in a pinch for gardening and many other things.

All this talk about her hair though - it's so easy to transfer hair when you live with someone or even frequent their house etc.- If you are a female with long hair your hair gets everywhere in your house - and easily transfers to others.

I am not sure why all the consternation ? Maybe just chit chat ?

I really hope its not a subtle way of throwing more
"shade" towad the killers wife. Right now from all we know she is a victim NOT a participant.

JMO
 
  • #6,125
Why would LE indicate that they were coming out with the info about Vergata because they had already contacted her family members, and yet, her 2 grown sons were apparently clueless.
[snipped by me] I'm curious about this too. Do we know who the relative is who gave the sample? It's possible that LE assumed that person would alert the family.

jmo
 
  • #6,126
It does, doesn't it? But LE has travel records that she and the children were out of the state for all 3 of the disappearances/deaths they are able to get travel info for. That throws another monkey wrench into the any usual pattern, doesn't it? I don't recall ever reading anything like hair and DNA from a recognizable, familial source like that before. Has anyone else? I recall (or think I recall) that Bittrolf was ID'd because his brother's DNA was in the system, but it was Bittrolf's DNA on the victim. Surely, this has happened before? Wouldn't RH's wife be in a world of trouble without the travel records?
I'm thinking maybe the burlap came from one of the greenhouses where she probably spent time?

Speculation
 
  • #6,127
How reliable is Kolker?
I've not read the book.
Like others have stated, I would say Kolker's book is very well researched. That said, you also have to consider that many of his sources might not have all their facts straight either. The definitive source is always LE, imo , but there again, in this particular case, LE hasn't always had a reputation for transparency and truth.

All just my opinion.
 
  • #6,128
It's not like a lightswitch, though. All offenders are capable of both disorganised and organised behaviour. Bundy's a good example to point to in that. While a lot of his behaviour was highly organised, he would medicate with alcohol, he would be impulsive, and towards the end, he exhibited decompensation that introduced a lot of uncontrolled, extreme overkill to his crimes, but also probably ensured he got caught.

A crime is a dynamic thing. The difference between if a scene presents as organised and disorganised could come down to intoxication, a passing mental health crisis, if a victim fights or behaves in an unexpected way (like escaping), if the perpetrator is disturbed in the middle of the crime.

We think of killers being meticulous and getting away with it for ages as being clever, but sometimes, it's striking something that works early on and doing it over and over without getting too clever about it, and being lucky enough to not get caught. Gary Ridgway and Samuel Little come to mind.

MOO
You stated this so much more succinctly than I ever could have. Thank you !
 
  • #6,129
[snipped by me] I'm curious about this too. Do we know who the relative is who gave the sample? It's possible that LE assumed that person would alert the family.

jmo
I haven't seen any name mentioned specifically, only that a relative provided a cheek swab in October after the familial dna search linked to what they had of Karen's.
 
  • #6,130
It's not like a lightswitch, though. All offenders are capable of both disorganised and organised behaviour. Bundy's a good example to point to in that. While a lot of his behaviour was highly organised, he would medicate with alcohol, he would be impulsive, and towards the end, he exhibited decompensation that introduced a lot of uncontrolled, extreme overkill to his crimes, but also probably ensured he got caught.

A crime is a dynamic thing. The difference between if a scene presents as organised and disorganised could come down to intoxication, a passing mental health crisis, if a victim fights or behaves in an unexpected way (like escaping), if the perpetrator is disturbed in the middle of the crime.

We think of killers being meticulous and getting away with it for ages as being clever, but sometimes, it's striking something that works early on and doing it over and over without getting too clever about it, and being lucky enough to not get caught. Gary Ridgway and Samuel Little come to mind.

MOO
I’m thinking also of age. Killers get older, lazier? Sloppy? Forgetful?
 
  • #6,131
I'm thinking maybe the burlap came from one of the greenhouses where she probably spent time?

Speculation
interesting . . . Since it was camo burlap and not the gardening type, I'm not sure. Did he perhaps keep his "hunting" supplies in a lawn shed along with her gardening supplies?
 
  • #6,132
Just wanted to clarify that I'm not citing financial abuse as the reason AE is now continuing to live in the house, but rather a possible explanation why she and the kids had to sleep in a vehicle rather than a motel during the investigation of the house.

Your possible reasons why they are remaining in the house now that they are allowed back in all seem extremely plausible.
Surely an advocate of victims should of helped them. In cases of fire etc we have agencies that come to victims. Did she refuse help? Daughter was employed? Son on SSI but no money? Was bank accounts frozen? Yet they had money for a rental car? It doesn’t add up. JMOO
 
  • #6,133
I’m thinking also of age. Killers get older, lazier? Sloppy? Forgetful?
Also, they slow down, they get injured or things like arthritis, their senses can worsen, but also, the world changes, forensics develops. What was organised and 'clean' enough preDNA, isn't anymore. What was a stealthy entrance and exit isn't any more in the age of Ring. While leaving town used to work, it doesn't in the age of centralised databases. And while driving and disposing at night used to be good enough, it isn't in the age where traffic cams, business cams, and even your phone and car track and log your movements. In this era, all but the most disorganised of criminals are going to exhibit some behaviour that used to be classed as organised just to keep ahead of the game, and those highly disorganised ones are probably the ones who belong in a psychiatric or drug rehabilitation setting, anyway.

MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #6,134
How reliable is Kolker?
I've not read the book.
The only thing I'd caution is a lot of the reporting on Shannan's last morning seen a live comes from Pak's account. Since Kolker was ahead of a lot of sleuths and depositions, he gives Pak's statements more credibility than warranted.

It's an excellent book, and humanizes victims well.

MOO
 
  • #6,135
*I’ve forgotten an important detail. Was it reported RH is a disorganized serial killer?

In contrast, the disorganized offender is likely to be of below average intelligence, low birth order, and subjected to harsh parental discipline. He is in a confused and distressed state of mind at the time of the murder, is socially inadequate, and sexually incompetent. The crime scene shows that the crime was committed suddenly with no set plan of action for deterring detection. Facial destruction and sexually sadistic acts performed after the murder are typical. Disorganized offenders usually leave the victim in the same position in which he or she was killed and make no attempt to conceal the body. Case examples and photographs are included

He's an organised serial killer
 
Last edited:
  • #6,136
Most women shed a lot of hair. Maybe it's just more noticeable as our hair is generally longer than most male styles. Rex was likely oblivious to the fact that the wife's hair was in his vehicle, on his own clothes, etc. It is very easily transferred from one surface to another. Look around in your own vehicle, on your clothes, etc., and I'll bet you can find a hair or two at any given time.

I wonder if the Chevy Avalanche had cloth seats (vs. vinyl or leather)? I would think cloth might be more likely to have stray hair clinging to it. MOO.
 
  • #6,137
Does anyone know if any of the victims connected to RH and those he's not been connected to were HIV positive?
 
  • #6,138
Surely an advocate of victims should of helped them. In cases of fire etc we have agencies that come to victims. Did she refuse help? Daughter was employed? Son on SSI but no money? Was bank accounts frozen? Yet they had money for a rental car? It doesn’t add up. JMOO
I haven't seen any MSM reporting that any victims' advocacy group was helping AE while she had no living arrangements while LE searched the house. I also don't think she would have refused help, she seems very open to help when it has been offered according to her statements to the media and MSM reporting. Daughter was employed at her father's firm which closed the day he was arrested. Son may have been on SSI but that likely wasn't a lot of money and who knows where they were with regard to the monthly cycle of SSI payments. Bank accounts may not have been frozen, but if they were living from paycheck to paycheck as many people do, there might not have been much to draw from after bills were paid, like mortgage, etc. She could have used a credit card for a car and hotel, but if she was trying to keep credit card purchases low, a rental car for a week is a lot cheaper than a hotel for a week. (That's if the car was a rental, I don't recall if it was a rental car or her car or a relative's car.)
 
  • #6,139
I was sitting here reading and silently agreeing with how easy it is for long hair to get everywhere, when I look up and see a glint. Somehow a strand of my hair is currently dangling off the main ceiling light...
 
  • #6,140
I was sitting here reading and silently agreeing with how easy it is for long hair to get everywhere, when I look up and see a glint. Somehow a strand of my hair is currently dangling off the main ceiling light...
that should be fine , so long as there is no corpse attached to it...
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
161
Guests online
2,546
Total visitors
2,707

Thread Chapters

Forum statistics

Threads
646,082
Messages
18,853,991
Members
245,896
Latest member
jpintozzi
Top