- Joined
- Jul 11, 2015
- Messages
- 2,701
- Reaction score
- 25,810
Yes, hair gets everywhere, especially via the floors, bedding and simply being in a washing machine.
I am kinda fuzzy on the timeline atm, but wasn't their own kid in a similar age to the killed toddler at the time of the murder? This could not only explain the possible remorse behaviour with the kid (wrapping etc), but possibly also the hair - post-partum hair shedding is a thing. Mentioning it just in case if the murder victim with most AE hair found was murdered during the first lifeyear of their daughter, not that it really needs an extra reason, but just an interesting biology fact.
Feelings:
It really upsets me - that Rex was parenting a child the toddler's age, was parenting an adolescent/young woman the same age as his alleged and possible victims. If he had no empathy for the victims, could he not empathize with their fathers?
Evidence:
Let's talk about the hair that is NOT there: How was it that Rex, assuming he transported the GB4 on his own and brought along hairs from the household, managed NOT to drop his own hairs at the scene. Burlap is rough and grabs at jagged fingernails, entraps hair, etc. and Rex has always worn his hair with enough length to shed strands that could endure the elements if his wife's could. If the murders were committed in his bed, as someone postulated (and it could be what happened; I know of nothing to rule that out) why wouldn't his hairs also get onto the bodies?
Did Rex clean the bodies of his hair and sources of DNA, but just leave his wife's hair caught in a belt? Why?
MOO