Halyna Hutchins Shot With Prop Gun - Alec Baldwin indicted & Hannah Gutierrez-Reed charged, 2021 #8

  • #761
it's a civil damages case and the set is insured. everything is in settlement, there is no criminality on Alec's part period. EOS. mOO
 
  • #762
Surely, if it's his company and he was control of it then he can initiate legal proceedings on its behalf?

I tend to agree that it will go nowhere, however.
Any person can represent themselves in court. But a registered business (a corporation or limited liability company) is an actual other entity. You have to be an attorney to represent them. (there are often exceptions in small claims type matters). I can't for sure say what N.M. statutes say, but I'd be surprised if he can pursue this type of case on behalf of the company without legal representation.
 
  • #763
Any person can represent themselves in court. But a registered business (a corporation or limited liability company) is an actual other entity. You have to be an attorney to represent them. (there are often exceptions in small claims type matters). I can't for sure say what N.M. statutes say, but I'd be surprised if he can pursue this type of case on behalf of the company without legal representation.

Do you know why he is also suing Halyna’s husband?
 
  • #764
Do you know why he is also suing Halyna’s husband?
Is he?

Did her husband take a producer credit or some part of the rights to the film, or something?
 
  • #765
Is he?

Did her husband take a producer credit or some part of the rights to the film, or something?

I will have to look for it but I did see a piece that said it was Alex and Halynas husband.

As far as credits I don’t know the details. At one time he was going to be involved with it but I haven’t kept up with it.
 
  • #766
Do you know why he is also suing Halyna’s husband?
Is the Complaint available somewhere? I haven't had time to go look.
 
  • #767
Is the Complaint available somewhere? I haven't had time to go look.
Matthew Hutchins is Defendant Party #34 in the case number D-101-CV-202502674 in Santa Fe District.

10/22/2025 OPN: COMPLAINT
Complaint False Light, Conversion, Unjust Enrichment and Tortious Interference


 
  • #768
Matthew Hutchins is Defendant Party #34 in the case number D-101-CV-202502674 in Santa Fe District.


10/22/2025OPN: COMPLAINT
Complaint False Light, Conversion, Unjust Enrichment and Tortious Interference


Thank you. I can't see where to look at the Complaint. But, it does show that there are 35+ defendants, suing everyone possibly associated. BUT only 4 summons requested/issued so far and those are just AB, Rust, Mitchell and Halls. Very weird.
 
  • #769
Thank you. I can't see where to look at the Complaint. But, it does show that there are 35+ defendants, suing everyone possibly associated. BUT only 4 summons requested/issued so far and those are just AB, Rust, Mitchell and Halls. Very weird.
Sure thing. I don’t know if the complaint can be found online. I tried Pacer under Kenney’s name and also under PDQ, and the search didn’t return anything. Maybe here? Login | ClerkTrack Web
 
  • #770
Someone gifted me a WS Guardianship - many thanks to whoever it was😘
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
137
Guests online
2,268
Total visitors
2,405

Forum statistics

Threads
635,353
Messages
18,674,419
Members
243,174
Latest member
Bedroom Detective
Back
Top