• #41
  • #42
  • #43
  • #44
But this photo was taken in 2024???

😳

What kind od work is it
that is lasting nearly 2 years
(2025 is nearly finished)
with residents kept being trapped with no daylight???

Jeez!!! 🙄

SMH in sheer horror.

JMO
 
  • #45
  • #46
From Sky News on the ground:


They also present the people's voice and not just regurgitate the authorities' narrative of what happened .
 
  • #47
  • #48
But this photo was taken in 2024???

😳

What kind od work is it
that is lasting nearly 2 years
(2025 is nearly finished)
with residents kept being trapped with no daylight???
The netting I have seen used in the UK does seem to be sufficiently loosely woven to allow a fair amount of daylight through, though behind it is likely to be quite shaded - a sort of green twilight perhaps.

It appears that this stuff is not necessarily fire resistant. Looking at some UK suppliers of construction materials, much of it is not fire resistant but some of it is.


I don't know anything about UK requirements for buildings under construction, but it's possible that netting used on buildings which are occupied while work goes on has to be fire retardant and that the requirements are less stringent where buildings are empty during renovations. Needless to say, we don't have to contend with flammable bamboo scaffolding here.

It wouldn't surprise me if corners were cut with materials used on the tower blocks in Hong Kong.
 
  • #49
The netting I have seen used in the UK does seem to be sufficiently loosely woven to allow a fair amount of daylight through, though behind it is likely to be quite shaded - a sort of green twilight perhaps.

It appears that this stuff is not necessarily fire resistant. Looking at some UK suppliers of construction materials, much of it is not fire resistant but some of it is.


I don't know anything about UK requirements for buildings under construction, but it's possible that netting used on buildings which are occupied while work goes on has to be fire retardant and that the requirements are less stringent where buildings are empty during renovations. Needless to say, we don't have to contend with flammable bamboo scaffolding here.

It wouldn't surprise me if corners were cut with materials used on the tower blocks in Hong Kong.
Natural materials can be combustible, but man-made plastic is highly flammable unless treated with some kind of retardant.

Be wary of some trying to twist the narrative of a tragic event. Choose who you trust, wisely.

MOO
 
  • #50
Natural materials can be combustible, but man-made plastic is highly flammable unless treated with some kind of retardant.

Be wary of some trying to twist the narrative of a tragic event. Choose who you trust, wisely.

MOO
And this stuff wasn't even that. It wasn't up to code.


 
Last edited:
  • #51
And this stuff wasn't even that. It wasn't up to code.


Yes the authorities have now changed the narrative about the cause of fire. But IMO they have simply found another scapegoat - some replacement netting after an earlier typhoon. Meaning the original netting was still up to standard.. and untouchable in political terms. But at least the focus is no longer on the bamboo.

The second link is quite spot on. Maybe the Chinese ambassador will now come out and condemn the ABC for sedition 😏
 
  • #52
  • #53
  • #54
  • #55
Here is a summary of the still ongoing inquiry on the fire, published on 12 April.

So far no organisation, business or government, has admitted any wrongdoing. Even though it is well accepted that the fire was due to human errors and not a natural disaster or accident.

The complete list of names in the final 168 death toll have not been disclosed to the public either.


Other reports from HKFP, an independent English language media organisation based in Hong Kong:

 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
34
Guests online
3,620
Total visitors
3,654

Forum statistics

Threads
647,412
Messages
18,876,411
Members
246,318
Latest member
gatekeeper1
Top