I wonder if the high ranking military official could be the "minister" Silsby referred to. Note, she did not use the word "pastor" or "missionary" as she did with some others. She said "minister". That word is used for official positions in the DR.
ITA, i.b.nora, about the comments about documents. Not only Puello seems to put an awful lot of stock in documents, but so did Silsby. I would think that Judge Sainvil could follow the paper trail of these so-called documents and clearly determine what is going on.
Is it truly possible that Silsby was horribly unlucky in just meeting the wrong people? That she truly was trying to set up an orphanage/island hide-out and fell into the laps of the bad guys? Or did the bad guys take advantage of her naivete and help her as much as possible thinking she'd be the perfect "front" for a supply of children. Was the primo duper, duped?
I wish Ms. d'Adesky would give us a little more. Why doesn't she name the trafficker? She's playing the drama card a bit much for me.
It's a "tune in tomorrow" tone. Not at all like her usual writing.
ITA, i.b.nora, about the comments about documents. Not only Puello seems to put an awful lot of stock in documents, but so did Silsby. I would think that Judge Sainvil could follow the paper trail of these so-called documents and clearly determine what is going on.
Is it truly possible that Silsby was horribly unlucky in just meeting the wrong people? That she truly was trying to set up an orphanage/island hide-out and fell into the laps of the bad guys? Or did the bad guys take advantage of her naivete and help her as much as possible thinking she'd be the perfect "front" for a supply of children. Was the primo duper, duped?
I wish Ms. d'Adesky would give us a little more. Why doesn't she name the trafficker? She's playing the drama card a bit much for me.
It's a "tune in tomorrow" tone. Not at all like her usual writing.