One of the most "under-reported stories" of 2008. No wonder I hadn't heard of it. So what are the Baptists wanting to hide:
http://www.abpnews.com/content/view/3719/53/
"Facing calls to curb child sex abuse within its churches, in June the Southern Baptist Convention -- the largest U.S. religious body after the Catholic Church -- urged local hiring committees to conduct federal background checks but rejected a proposal to create a central database of staff and clergy who have been either convicted of or indicted on charges of molesting minors," the magazine noted.
"The SBC decided against such a database in part because its principle of local autonomy means it cannot compel individual churches to report any information. And while the headlines regarding churches and pedophilia remain largely focused on Catholic parishes, the lack of hierarchical structure and systematized record-keeping in most Protestant churches makes it harder not only for church leaders to impose standards, but for interested parties to track allegations of abuse."
If you want to follow a clear trail of abuses in the SBC, which the SBC has covered up for decades, you can check Christa Brown's STOP BAPTIST PREDATORS sites. She has a "tracking site" that keeps track of cases, and a blog in which she explores cases in depth:
Tracking Site: http://stopbaptistpredators.org/index.htm
Blog: http://stopbaptistpredators.blogspot.com/
Though I have written a lot of commentary on the case (while Christa was in New York), normally I cover sex abuse of children (and other abuses) in Christian Fundamentalism, mostly Independent Baptist churches. And yes, the extent of cover up is incredible, and the amount of abuse rivals that of the Catholic Church. It is just way under-reported. (I also write and produce materials to help victims regain their faith or at least relearn it so they can decide more clearly if they do or do not believe.)
Blog on the Lillypad: http://www.jeriwho.net/lillypad2/blogger.htm