mysteriew
A diamond in process
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2004
- Messages
- 23,813
- Reaction score
- 923
I think the GJ will find there is enough to try him in both cases. The circumstantial evidence is more compelling in the Savio case, imo. He could be charged with it first.
If he is charged and convicted in Kathleen's...will it help Stacy's case? If he is charged in Stacy's first and convicted...will that be more beneficial to a conviction in Kathleen's?
The District Attorney's Office has some difficult decisions ahead even after the GJ hands down their decisions...providing there ARE indictments against Drew.
I agree that the GJ will most likely issue indictments. It is rare for a prosecutor to take a case to the GJ and not get an indictment. The GJ is often called the prosecutor's jury for a reason.
As far as which case has the most evidence, I am not sure. We know of quite a bit of evidence in Kathleen's case, and have surmised more. But Stacy's we only know what the media has found out and that isn't much. But it is important to realize that we don't know what the evidence is in her case, cause LE isn't talking. I do know one thing- LE called it a homicide fairly quickly- they don't do that unless they feel they have compelling evidence that a death has occurred. And they named DrewP a suspect very early- again something they do not do unless they feel they have compelling evidence.
Yes, prosecution is looking for something (her body) that will counteract the defense claim that Stacy left voluntarily, but they can take it to trial without the body if the prosecution is confident and bold enough. I actually look for them to charge them both at the same time or one quickly followed by the other. Because each will bolster the evidence of the other. Same problems, allegations, and patterns of behavior.