- Joined
- May 17, 2009
- Messages
- 33,525
- Reaction score
- 219,330
I don’t recall Sarah or anyone else mentioning a dog, other than in his obituary. Perhaps it died prior to his going missing.Where was his dog that night he went missing?
I don’t recall Sarah or anyone else mentioning a dog, other than in his obituary. Perhaps it died prior to his going missing.Where was his dog that night he went missing?
Sac County and surrounding counties are rural areas with small towns and communities. People know or have a pretty good idea who the drug and meth users are. Even some of the well to do people you would never suspect think there drug use is a secret but its not. Everone knows everyones business. I don’t know Sarah but have defended her on other sights and always gave her the benefit of doubt. However, living with someone doing meth , I just feel she had to know he was a tweeker. The signs are so obvious.So this makes me wonder if everyone around him was just so very blind to his addiction. Wasn’t there anybody that noticed changes in him? maybe thought to help him? or maybe tried and it just wasn’t possible. Or perhaps he hadn’t been using meth for very long and he just didn’t realize the affect it would have on him. I’ve never been around anyone using meth so I don’t know the behavior changes. Maybe somebody else on this list can offer up their understanding of what happens. Seems to me it would be noticeable.
Even if anyone did suspect drug use it’s totally impossible to “make” someone stop or get help unless the user decides to on their own. IMO SS is a victim of DS actions. She may very well have tried to help him. DS was responsible for his own actions, no matter how well intended (feed his family) and sadly paid the highest price and so is his family. JMO.Sac County and surrounding counties are rural areas with small towns and communities. People know or have a pretty good idea who the drug and meth users are. Even some of the well to do people you would never suspect think there drug use is a secret but its not. Everone knows everyones business. I don’t know Sarah but have defended her on other sights and always gave her the benefit of doubt. However, living with someone doing meth , I just feel she had to know he was a tweeker. The signs are so obvious.
What you state is all true. But there was always something wonky about Sarah’s portrayal of David and his disappearance.Even if anyone did suspect drug use it’s totally impossible to “make” someone stop or get help unless the user decides to on their own. IMO SS is a victim of DS actions. She may very well have tried to help him. DS was responsible for his own actions, no matter how well intended (feed his family) and sadly paid the highest price and so is his family. JMO.
I fully agree with that. Yes, I do feel she was a victim of her husband’s actions. But, was she an enabler too? I also agree with some one who previously said something about her behavior was wonky. As I go back and read the different interviews and statements, IMO I leaning towards she was an enabler and was trying to keep the drug use hidden for whatever reason, which could be many. If she was considered enabler, would that have changed the outcome, maybe, maybe not. I still support SS in every way.Even if anyone did suspect drug use it’s totally impossible to “make” someone stop or get help unless the user decides to on their own. IMO SS is a victim of DS actions. She may very well have tried to help him. DS was responsible for his own actions, no matter how well intended (feed his family) and sadly paid the highest price and so is his family. JMO.
Ah, well. Case is closed. LE , SS and the whole scenario shut down. There are many questions of what, when and how that will never be answered.I fully agree with that. Yes, I do feel she was a victim of her husband’s actions. But, was she an enabler too? I also agree with some one who previously said something about her behavior was wonky. As I go back and read the different interviews and statements, IMO I leaning towards she was an enabler and was trying to keep the drug use hidden for whatever reason, which could be many. If she was considered enabler, would that have changed the outcome, maybe, maybe not. I still support SS in every way.
Actually I think I can relate… I’ve lived in small Iowa towns for the majority of my life and one thing they all have in common is social segmentation. It wouldn’t be inaccurate to describe it as as a caste system. I’ve experienced that from both sides. She seemed concerned from the start that LE wasn’t going to prioritize this. I don’t necessarily think she was wrong about that.What you state is all true. But there was always something wonky about Sarah’s portrayal of David and his disappearance.
Ken McClure is the Sheriff of Sac County. If you don't think he is doing a good job, vote for someone else.If they would of done there job and grid search that area it would of saved her and they alot of heart ache. Someone needs to answer for it.
No one can be held accountable for not finding a needle in a haystack and yes grid search is the best way to search for a body but it is most difficult to organize. They simply do not and did not have the tremendous manpower needed, nor blanket permissions to search private property, to do grid searches for many square miles of land. A great effort was made to find the victim and that was with LE knowing and/or suspecting the information that we now know. MOO Retired LE and have searched for many missing personsIf they would of done there job and grid search that area it would of saved her and they alot of heart ache. Someone needs to answer for it.
Agree, but… instead tens or hundreds did ‘wild’ non-grid searches zooming all over for miles, exaggerated claims by some as to how many thousands of acres they covered which were also not grid searches. We have a thread here on WS devoted to cases where people were later located in a very small radius of where they went missing… and it just makes me think a grid search is absolutely necessary and this should be addressed by all police forces across the US. There may not be manpower to do a grid search, but what about the manpower wasted to perform expanded searches over the next weeks or months, when the initial area was not thoroughly covered and if it had been, those subsequent searches would not have been necessary.No one can be held accountable for not finding a needle in a haystack and yes grid search is the best way to search for a body but it is most difficult to organize. They simply do not and did not have the tremendous manpower needed, nor blanket permissions to search private property, to do grid searches for many square miles of land. A great effort was made to find the victim and that was with LE knowing and/or suspecting the information that we now know. MOO Retired LE and have searched for many missing persons
This has been my issue from the beginning with David. I have seen way too many missed within a short distance of where they went missing. My question is how can we do better for the next one? If there is a missing toddler miraculously "resources" are available, as should be. If there is lack of resources available for adults, then maybe this should be transparent, options for additional resources should be expressed to the families of missing? I do not have all the answers. It is a problem, and it needs a solution.No one can be held accountable for not finding a needle in a haystack and yes grid search is the best way to search for a body but it is most difficult to organize. They simply do not and did not have the tremendous manpower needed, nor blanket permissions to search private property, to do grid searches for many square miles of land. A great effort was made to find the victim and that was with LE knowing and/or suspecting the information that we now know. MOO Retired LE and have searched for many missing persons
IMO dogs aren't as reliable as they used to be because they seem to miss things frequently.It is sus that the dogs did not pick up Dave's scent, especially with his body located so close to his vehicle. Who is incompetent, LE or the dogs?
i'm just curious if he was a habitual meth user or if he was dosed somehow... Meth isn't a pretty drug and habitual users tend to have alot of signs they are using.Even if anyone did suspect drug use it’s totally impossible to “make” someone stop or get help unless the user decides to on their own. IMO SS is a victim of DS actions. She may very well have tried to help him. DS was responsible for his own actions, no matter how well intended (feed his family) and sadly paid the highest price and so is his family. JMO.
LEIt is sus that the dogs did not pick up Dave's scent, especially with his body located so close to his vehicle. Who is incompetent, LE or the dogs?