If Tammy didn't get his name then how did the police get his name?
I always assumed he waited until the police got there, but wait, if he's not real,
My brain is tired all, have a wonderfully sleuthful nite.
:bedtime:
If Tammy didn't get his name then how did the police get his name?
Maybe they just used it to park in the driveway or garage and for easy access.
Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
Good Question! I happen not to believe either statement of Aunt Tammy's, neither that she saw him and talked to him, nor that police have his name. JMO. MOO.
was MM ever arrested for the most recent public intox incident? isnt she on parole?
Why would a kidnapper take children to a house that is for sale? I simply don't understand this. Houses that are for sale can be accessed by the owner and realtors without notice ... it just doesn't seem like a place to take kidnapped children because of the high risk of being discovered.
By the way ... when Victoria Stafford was missing, people also speculated that she was taken to an empty house. It was the wrong thinking in that case.
My opinion is: Since Tammy is the only person who has ever mentioned this person at the lake and since LE has never included this person in their timeline, I think this "conversation" should be look at thoroughly. Tammy reportedly said that the cops "have his name," but since there has been no further information about him, AFAIK, I have been wondering from the beginning why Aunt Tammy didn't get his name. . . .which makes me wonder if she made him up. JMO. MOO.
I am being snarky. TB using the term "on scene" makes me feel like someone who is assimilating LE terminology and someone who likes to fit in and get attention. Not saying she has anything to do with this - she just bugs me.
It's Megan is Missing. Can you watch it online?
I didn't say anything about a house for sale or an empty house, I said a house. There are several houses in the area that have people living in them. It's always possible that at least one of them is occupied by someone who isn't what he/she/they appear to be.
So if she asked have you seen two little girls on bikes and he says yep about 15 minutes ago heading west - wouldn't she then think oh thank God they are here. He then goes in his way. 15 minutes later LE arrives. Maybe he was still there and LE talked to him. They didn't share it with the public then.
Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
You can, but be careful. One person here got viruses on one of their two laptops because of it, and ever since I finally managed to figure out how to watch it my computer's been screwed up too. I don't know if it was the movie or not, though. Norton isn't finding anything.
I wish I'd known it was a horror movie and not a real case before I'd watched it. Just so you're fore-warned. Granted horrible things happen in these cases, but usually not every possible horrible thing all at once.
Wonder why that info would be withheld?
Shucks, I don't know if there was a real witness who saw the girls.
I don't know if i believe the girls were even at the lake where the bikes were found .:banghead:
I just for the life of me dont know how , if the witness is real, how the girls were abducted in the 15 minutes after he reported seeing him. Imoo
You can, but be careful. One person here got viruses on one of their two laptops because of it, and ever since I finally managed to figure out how to watch it my computer's been screwed up too. I don't know if it was the movie or not, though. Norton isn't finding anything.
I wish I'd known it was a horror movie and not a real case before I'd watched it. Just so you're fore-warned. Granted horrible things happen in these cases, but usually not every possible horrible thing all at once.
If, IF, the unnamed witness isn't real , who is the last known person who saw the girls after the CCTV sighting?Perhaps someone can pull up this interview to confirm, but I believe a reporter asked her about this guy and her casual and vague response was along the lines of "the Police have his name and number". They were asking for information about POSSIBLY THE LAST PERSON TO HAVE SEEN YOUR NIECES, and that's the answer you give? No description, details, specifics. WOW!!!!
My opinion is: Since Tammy is the only person who has ever mentioned this person at the lake and since LE has never included this person in their timeline, I think this "conversation" should be look at thoroughly. Tammy reportedly said that the cops "have his name," but since there has been no further information about him, AFAIK, I have been wondering from the beginning why Aunt Tammy didn't get his name. . . .which makes me wonder if she made him up. JMO. MOO.
Yes she did state he was a "random stranger". I don't think she said he gave her his name and # but she said in an interview that LE has his contact info. But it was weird at the time because she sounded like she was either suspicious of him herself or trying to cast suspicion on him.
The direction stuff would make sense if they were at the grassy area but then I REALLY have to wonder why they didn't find the bikes and/or why it took so long for LE to find them. They would have been so close. But I could see being suspicious of someone she may have come across back there.
Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
If, IF, the unnamed witness isn't real , who is the last known person who saw the girls after the CCTV sighting?