- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- Messages
- 1,826
- Reaction score
- 188
So we have:
11:30 Girls leave E's house
12:15 Girls seen on video
12:20 T.G. Sees abandoned bikes
2:00 Girls are late - Aunt, Gmom & brother start search - are told be neighbor (name?) he was watering lawn between 12-3 and saw girls. Verified local thinks this odd or unlikely.
2:45 H.C reports girls missing at local LE station
3:00 Lake is swarmed by police
3:57 Bikes found by LE (fireman?)
I need to go grab links to back all this up but I'll need to get my laptop. What else should be on here and I'll start looking for MSM conformation?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is what I am referring to in comparison to what our friend Abben has stated. He has only stated 12:15 and when the bikes were found (which I'm still not 100% certain, due to reporting, if the 3:57 time is the actual time LE found the bikes...or if that was the time HE got there - the times are very close.) I just don't understand why, given the info that they HAVE released, LE won't put out a timeline.
If the 12:20 bike rider who swerved to miss the bikes should be considered in the "disappearance timeline" then say that! I think everyone is really just trying to understand at least a LITTLE about what LE is thinking. Are we trying to nail down a disappearance between 12:15 and 12:20???...or are we working with a 12:15-bikes found timeline? HUGE difference. I know ALL tips are welcome but I don't know why this "vagueness" on the approx times hasn't changed one bit...yet they claim they have evidence etc.
Also...on the point of the paddle boater? I have a feeling this person isn't going to come forward now...would you? I mean it's 10 days after the fact and you now are going to come forward and say you were there...even if you were? Let the questions begin...