Hi Jules 71
Here are the two paddle boats that I see on Bing maps:
Hi! Awesome! There is one more, I think up in the skinny canal part of the lake. It looks more like a mini pontoon on a dock.
Hi Jules 71
Here are the two paddle boats that I see on Bing maps:
I dont know but in so many cases the victim(s) are never noticed. Maybe the witnesses just didnt look up at that particular time in order to see the girls when they were on the boat.<snipped for space>
If TG did report seeing a paddleboat, that may be why LE is acting like he doesn't exist. If the perp WAS on a paddleboat, they wouldn't want the only person who may be able to identify him in danger.
Hi! Awesome! There is one more, I think up in the skinny canal part of the lake. It looks more like a mini pontoon on a dock.
Has anyone found out if the house for sale is actually owned by that particular individual's family, or is it just someone with the same last name?
Yes, to protect TG from the perp. If I witnessed something I thought was innocuous...and I reported it...but then it turned out NOT to be so innocuous, I would hope the police wouldn't publicly announce me. Lol
Yes, to protect TG from the perp. If I witnessed something I thought was innocuous...and I reported it...but then it turned out NOT to be so innocuous, I would hope the police wouldn't publicly announce me. Lol
If a paddleboat was used to abduct the girls, where would it have docked to get the girls off the paddleboat and into a different vehicle and when would the paddleboat have returned to its original location. This scenario would require more than one person involved in the abduction. imo
This.
From the NG transcripts
COOK-MORRISSEY: At 2:00 o`clock, my mother, their grandmother, called and said she couldn`t find them. They`d been on a bike ride, and you know, to come directly to Heather`s home. I only work just up the street. I came directly there...My mom had been driving around looking for them. We stood in the yard and talked for a few minutes. Heather pulled up, had not been able to find them. It was about 2:20, 2:30 PM. And so Heather said, I`m going to the police station. And that`s when she went to the Evansdale PD to involve them.
I dabble in a bit of statement analysis and this seems extremely unusual wording.
It was Heather's decision to call the Evansdale PD, not MCMs or WC's. The phrase "to involve them" sounds like it's optional, a choice Heather alone made.
Indeed, Heather went unaccompanied to the police station to report her daughter missing.
She is placing Heather's decision to alert LE outside of her and her mothers decision, which was clearly not to "involve" LE. This would be contradictory behaviour because they say they were alarmed and searching almost straight away.
The question is then, why did they not want LE involved?![]()