What do you think about convicted Iowa murderer Jerry Lee Burns as a suspect?Jodi wasn't investigating anything. She wasn't an investigative reporter. She was an anchor.
It is a virtual certainty that Jodi was abducted by a stalker with a sexual motivation. The only way Honken could be the perp is if he happened to be a sexual predator of women in addition to his other crimes. There is no evidence that he had anything to do with Jodi's disappearance. IMO, comments about knowledge of the crime from him—if there actually were any such comments—were nothing more than empty bragging for "street cred."
Of the known suspects, Tony DeWayne Jackson is far and away the best suspect, in my opinion.
Van Sice doesn't make much sense as a suspect for two reasons: 1) he had a certain level of access to Jodi and wouldn't have needed to grab her by force in her parking lot, and 2) he was under a microscope practically from t=0; if he had done it, LE would have found a mountain of forensic evidence (including Jodi's body, most likely).
The unidentified palm print on Jodi's car forces me to consider the possibility that the perp could be someone who isn't on anyone's radar screen, but that print could be from any random person who touched Jodi's car, so I would not write off any suspect because of the palm print.
Honken makes very little sense as a suspect, in my opinion. Any registered sex offender living in the surrounding area in 1995 would make a better suspect than Honken.
The guy JH bought her Miata from, who some locals have said she was 'seeing', and whose plates were still on the vehicle when JH was abducted trying to enter it?
How about the individual(s) who'd been stalking JH, calling, trailing her, the person who'd caused her to state, just hours before she disappeared, that she intended to change her phone number?