Sometimes I also think it is a deleted post since we can no longer completely delete and can only edit.Thank you. I thought that, too, but there's a "watch thread" button for that. Just confusing to me....![]()
Sometimes I also think it is a deleted post since we can no longer completely delete and can only edit.Thank you. I thought that, too, but there's a "watch thread" button for that. Just confusing to me....![]()
The easiest way to understand it is that it is a computer based platform that is online where students login to their classes. MT was taking a history class if I recall. So, this platform would have the course syllabus, assignments, professor lectures in audio and video formats, videos, link to communicate with professor, possible chat space for students and teaching assistant, reading materials, links to reading materials in the library or maybe outside links as necessary. Students typically have to submit their assignments via this system using the appropriate file format by a certain time and some schools even let students take tests on the system (my school did not allow this). The system would recognize the time the assignment was sent and document that for the professor to make sure the student was on time. So, the system effectively creates a 'hub' where virtually everything you need for your class, including access to professor and fellow students is all in one place and in my experience everything is tracked behind the scenes by the system. In the system I used we had the ability to form study groups within the course link and all kinds of documents, audio and video could be shared and we could do audio and video meetings through the platform. So, if MT was taking a class this summer she no doubt spent a fair amount of time online using the system. Hope this helps.For us old people please explain Canvas.
A large reward can waste their time, too, considering the great volume of false leads it brings in - though with a reward, it must be said, it keeps the case in media.Yes, this case is being handled very poorly. They are not really interested in the public's help. Which I can understand to a point. When they make a public appeal, they can get thousand of leads, including a lot of bad information, that just wastes their time.
OH, that makes way more sense. Phew.Sometimes I also think it is a deleted post since we can no longer completely delete and can only edit.
Why didn't her mother think something was off during the evening of July 18? Wasn't MT supposed to eat dinner with her mother and/or pick up the car that night?
Btw.. when this happened to me I was in public and totally embarrassed because I had no idea it was a feature on my phone.. I also said if i was kidnapped this would be horrible to actually do because the noise was loud and would tip the perp off I just called 911 vs. a silent alarm. And my phone was on silent at the time.Yes, I accidentally activated mine fanning myself with an iphone 7. If you wave the phone like a fan.....a horrible noise like a siren plays and says on the screen 911 is being dispatched to you. You have to speak to someone to stop it.
yes--seems logical to do homework--then relax@wary said: ↑
How do we know she got home safe from jogging?
In my experience here and elsewhere, I find the most difficult and misunderstood concept in computer and mobile forensics is the "digital timestamp." Accordingly, I'm quite confident that the initial idea put forth by LE that Mollie worked on homework late in the evening (i.e., inferring homework after 7:30 pm run) is most likely an incomplete analysis, or misinterpretation of the "digital timestamp." Whereas understanding the Epoch, Unix, UTC, encoding of digital analysis is beyond the scope of this post, it's suffice to say the computational systems that create digital timestamps nearly always differ or drift from real-world time. (And just to make it more complicated, the University server/cloud adds yet another layer of difficulty to establish the timestamp).
I believe Mollie took care of the dogs and worked on homework between 5:30 pm -7:30 pm-ish; left BF house for her run intending to eventually end her jog at Mum's house where she'd enjoy a brat, and collect the car, but met up with danger before she arrived at Mum's place. I think she disappeared in her running clothes, and the red camp t-shirt and contact lenses irrelevant. It's becoming too difficult for me to watch this shattered family endure one more PC, and truly hope this nightmare comes to an end for them very soon.
At one time in life, I was a very weight conscience (this hasn’t changed) college girl (this certainly has!) who exercised avidly. And I can tell you that if I was going to be in a bridesbide gown and bikini in the DR in a few weeks, I’d say “no” to the brats! Nothing cancels out a run and ruins a bod like brats. I’m betting the “okay” her mom got was more of an “okay”....(I’ll be passing on that). So I really don’t think the dinner no-show tells us much on time of disappearance.I completely agree. I think mom and brothers just assumed she decided not to come for dinner. A lot of reasons for this, maybe they knew she was working on a paper, thought she was talking to boyfriend and lost track of time, fell asleep and took a nap after a busy day. Being a parent of a 20 year old woman is not an easy thing ( ask me how I know) especially the first summer back from college. It is a balance between letting them have their independence while still taking an interest in their safety. Assuming Mollie was taken jogging perhaps it's a good idea to make sure women have the ability to call 911 and quickly when they are out alone. I know that Apple watches have the ability to call 911 fast without entering a pin. Is this something that newer models of a fitbit can also do? If Mollie had had this capability it might have saved her life.
I believe we should refer to him as PP in the library..........
I think it didn’t raise alarm because their town has been so safe, that the thought of something bad happening to Mollie wasn’t what crossed their minds. They probably thought something like, “Well, I guess she doesn’t need the car, after all. She must have arranged a ride with someone else for the morning, I guess.” It was probably easy to think casually like this when nothing ever bad happens there. We’ve heard how people don’t bother locking their doors.I don't get it. If she "typically" collected the car in the evenings....why the heck was no one concerned she didn't show up to get it?? Or that she never responded about the hot dog dinner? I really don't think the family is involved but as a mom, I cannot understand why these non-typical actions didn't raise a red flag sooner...
agreeAt one time in life, I was a very weight conscience (this hasn’t changed) college girl (this certainly has!) who exercised avidly. And I can tell you that if I was going to be in a bridesbide gown and bikini in the DR in a few weeks, I’d say “no” to the brats! Nothing cancels out a run and ruins a bod like brats. I’m betting the “okay” her mom got was more of an “okay”....(I’ll be passing on that). So I really don’t think the dinner no-show tells us much on time of disappearance.
@wary said: ↑
How do we know she got home safe from jogging?
In my experience here and elsewhere, I find the most difficult and misunderstood concept in computer and mobile forensics is the "digital timestamp." Accordingly, I'm quite confident that the initial idea put forth by LE that Mollie worked on homework late in the evening (i.e., inferring homework after 7:30 pm run) is most likely an incomplete analysis, or misinterpretation of the "digital timestamp." Whereas understanding the Epoch, Unix, UTC, encoding of digital analysis is beyond the scope of this post, it's suffice to say the computational systems that create digital timestamps nearly always differ or drift from real-world time. (And just to make it more complicated, the University server/cloud adds yet another layer of difficulty to establish the timestamp).
I believe Mollie took care of the dogs and worked on homework between 5:30 pm -7:30 pm-ish; left BF house for her run intending to eventually end her jog at Mum's house where she'd enjoy a brat, and collect the car, but met up with danger before she arrived at Mum's place. I think she disappeared in her running clothes, and the red camp t-shirt and contact lenses irrelevant. It's becoming too difficult for me to watch this shattered family endure one more PC, and truly hope this nightmare comes to an end for them very soon.
..I always have my daughters text when they arrive and leave a destination
..if no text, I start to ''worry'' a little--because the older one forgets to text sometimes
..if I was a female, I'd be ready to dial 911 when approached by anyone--ready for action--not insane/obsessed--just aware
..there is a ''danger'' button on some phones, I thought??
I mentioned this earlier. I don’t understand it at all. 1. She didn’t show up for dinner and 2. She didn’t pick up the car
Her mother lives close and didn’t even think to check on her? I live by my parents and we are close, talk frequently. If I told them I was coming over for dinner and didn’t show, they would call me. If I didn’t answer, my dad would be stopping by just to make sure everything was ok. The fact that no one even batted an eye at her being a no show is very strange to me.. was that something she did often? Just not show up when she says she’s going to do something?
I think it may not be unusual since she was 20 and staying at a separate albeit nearby home. Twenty is a transition age, for sure. All the same, I am sure any text evidence of whether she was heading there for dinner for sure have been analyzed. Not shared with the media though.