I am so far, not even seeing any appeal issues. The defense was able to get the trial in another county. They can probably continue the "coercion" mantra, but I don't see that either. As for incapacity/incompetence for their client, he obviously understood what he did, tried to hide the evidence. He isn't the sharpest pencil in the box, but he doesn't meet the bar for borderline MR.
Completely agree with your assessment. I am still waiting for the defense to explain why "their client" stopped to approach a young woman who was born in the United States if he struggles to speak and understand English? How did he expect to communicate with her? How did he know she was threatening to call the police? I guess his only defense is "poor me, I'm in the U.S. illegally". Are we (more specifically the jury) supposed to feel sorry for him? I hope the prosecution brings this up.