- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 70,203
- Reaction score
- 273,634
There is a possible danger in trying that. It would work great if the jury was all made up of WS members. We can follow an argument and think things through.Probably a good thing I am not an attorney then.
I would have gone full blast into questioning him about every single thing he said.
Not that I would believe it, but just to trip him up on his own lies.
My Dad was a long time defense attorney as was my older brother. I was a prelaw major @ UC Berkeley but decided law wasn't for me. But I did work for my Dad for several years.
One thing he warned about was the obvious---'never ask the witness a question you dont know the answer to.'
And going full blast into this witness, when you have had one day to prepare, and he has been crafting his fantasy story for 3 years already---bad position for the DA.
You may think you are catching him in lies but he may have some crafty answers in his back pocket. And before you know it, you are digging yourself a hole.
And when you do catch him and he just shrugs and says IDK---the jury may overlook it as just an unknown. 'he doesn't know how they got back--they just walked away.'
We know how ridiculous that is, but not all of the jurors will. One or two may sympathise with him...

They always say not to lay down with swine when arguing at their level. Best to stay above the fray.
I think the best route should be to call witnesses that would counter this BS story. Like witnesses that could prove DJ was in Dubuque as he testified. And maybe early testimony from CBR's coworkers about his movements on July 19th.
Did anyone see him or hang out with him after work, before he left. Did anyone see him get into his car? etc etc
The ridiculous portions of his BS story can be poked at during the closing arguments. Probably better than trying to catch him in an obvious lie because it can backfire very easily. JMO