Hatfield
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2012
- Messages
- 17,014
- Reaction score
- 59,146
If i was a family member under a cloud of suspicion and i was hiring a PI it would be for the sole purpose of finding alternate evidence that pointed away from me and casts a cloud on other people and other scenarios. i would want that evidence held close to the vest to be used in the defense of me or my family member should a trial occur. I do NOT understand klein being hired by "the family" and then publicly making statements. That goes for Vilt too. if they find themselves in a situation where their investigation points to guilt of the parents, for example.. then just shut up. I hired you to help exonerate me not make things worse.
None of this makes sense to me.
This confuses me too especially since it has happened again now with the 2nd PI too.
The only thing I can figure is they thought by hiring the PIs that it would throw suspicioun away from them. It has backfired in both cases.
Which is telling me there is a certain arrogance in thinking that whatever was done with the boy can never be found out. There must be extreme confidence that the PIs can never find the boy. So does this give us a hint what may have happened to him? No way to ever find his body? I don't want to think about fire and flames again but.....?