Something that's been bugging me. So we know SB plays his cards close to his chest and is very careful when choosing his words. So far it's done him proud, he may have had doubts long before he ever admitted that the parents weren't being truthful and for all we know he may have felt this from the start. He has evidence we are not party to (and rightly so) upon which to form his LE opinion.
One of the things he said in the
interview with Tricia on January 28, 2016 really niggles me, especially when we discuss the scent/cadaver dogs and that's this statement from him:
11:10
Bessie: Right, I remember you telling us the last time. One of the other questions that comes up a lot is about the dog searches and the cadaver dogs, and we know that they were thrown off by the cremains in the reservoir, but before or after that did the…did either the scent dogs or the cadaver dogs alert or show any, you know, find anything that was relevant?
11:43
SB: You know,
we had a couple alerts you know that were just kind of, we consider nothing major,
but um a dog reacts unusual in a certain area and so we put more dogs in there and then the other dogs alerted so, um…you know. Actually, it’s been not real positive from having those dogs in there. We didn’t have anything that really led us to a certain place within our 3 mile radius.
I think, that in line with the way he has conducted this investigation (and himself) to date, that there is something we definitely don't know and that the dogs
did hit on something in the vehicle. We just don't know what at this time.
"A couple of alerts"
"other dogs alerted"
To what???
Option 1: They were scent dogs and alerted to the scent of DeOrr Jr which is easily explained as he is bound to have been in the family vehicle in his short life
Option 2: They were cadaver dogs and alerted to cadaverine
If you notice, Bessie mentions both types of dogs. SB doesn't clarify which alerted...

hwow: