Found Deceased ID - Joshua Vallow, 7, & Tylee Ryan, 16, Rexburg, Sept 2019 *mom arrested* #45

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #201
Thank you. It seems as though Kay would have more of a legal right to adopt than CV and LV, since Kay was the maternal grandmother, and CV was just an uncle.
Kay and her husband agreed to let CV and Lori to adopt JJ. Kay at that time was under impression that Lori was a good mother. And of course CV was her brother. CV asked to adopt JJ. Kay and Larry didn't have to agree, but they felt CV and Lori would be better suited to adopt JJ. I don't think it was yet known at the time of adoption that JJ was autistic. Autism is not usually diagnosed as early as 10 months.
 
  • #202
They thought that CV was in a better position to adopt JJ.
They also unfortunately were under the impression that Lori was a good mother.
 
  • #203
JJ is the son of Kay Woodcocks daughter. He was legally adopted by Charles and Lori Vallow. Kay Woodcock is JJ's biological Grandmother. Kay never had any legal standing for custody for JJ, as an adopted child. Nor did Kay even have a legal right to ongoing contact with JJ.
I believe it's Kay's son who is the father of JJ. Both biological parents were addicted to drugs, according to Kay and Larry. JJ went to Kay and Larry right from the hospital. Therefore, they could have adopted him themselves. According to Kay, Charles wanted children so he asked Kay and Larry if he could adopt JJ. They agreed. But they certainly could have refused and adopted him themselves. But Larry is much older than Kay, and they felt that Charles and Lori would make a good choice of adoptive parents.
 
  • #204
  • #205
So, um... they weren't aware that Hawaii has been under US jurisdiction for 122 years now, and an actual state for 61 of those?

Do you recall MP in the context of moving to Ammon said something about "jurisdicition"? Apparently AC was well aware that an investigation can get mixed up when it crosses state lines.

I was specifically speaking about Mexico when I said out of the jurisdiction of the U. S.; but everyone from the first scattered out of ID, then LV and CD made an attempt to get out of the States, IMO.
 
  • #206
Video analyzing Chad and Lori using victim risk continuum and victimology.
 
  • #207
  • #208
  • #209
  • #210
I think she's referring to the part about being tortured. Nate Eaton retracted the part from Nancy Grace show where he erroneously stated that Tylee was dismembered before death.

He said pre-mortem, but I wonder if he really meant post-mortem. He said he was sleep deprived during the Nancy Grace interview.

ETA: and the confusion over the ambiguous meaning of the word "dismember".
 
  • #211
Do you recall MP in the context of moving to Ammon said something about "jurisdicition"? Apparently AC was well aware that an investigation can get mixed up when it crosses state lines.

I was specifically speaking about Mexico when I said out of the jurisdiction of the U. S.; but everyone from the first scattered out of ID, then LV and CD made an attempt to get out of the States, IMO.
A move from Rexburg to Ammon (suggested to MP) would mean crossing county lines.
 
  • #212
I assumed that Annie was responding to JJ's head being in plastic (and/or beheaded). Who knows if she was just replying to one part of the post.
 
  • #213
A move from Rexburg to Ammon (suggested to MP) would mean crossing county lines.
Do they have any "cop" friends in Ammon like Officer Mow?
 
  • #214
  • #215
He said pre-mortem, but I wonder if he really meant post-mortem. He said he was sleep deprived during the Nancy Grace interview.

ETA: and the confusion over the ambiguous meaning of the word "dismember".
I think the question here is, does Nate have additional info about this or he just interpreted the court documents? IMO it's the latter.
 
  • #216
So, another jurisdiction. IMO
Yes. For example, Lori's home in Rexburg and Chad's house in Salem are in different counties (Madison and Fremont). Ammon is in Bonneville county.
 
Last edited:
  • #217
I think the question here is, does Nate have additional info about this or he just interpreted the court documents? IMO it's the latter.

That's what I thought - that he deduced this information from the APC.
"Was dismembered", can be taken as a verb, or as a descriptive term.

I think NE was trying to be sensitive to the condition/description of Tylee's body when it was found; but it was apparently taken by many that there was a specific action taken; whereas it could also mean it was the result of the fire.
 
  • #218
WARNING GRAPHIC
I think Nate got insider info from LEO on the ground. He has been first responder (or someone on his team) on nearly every event in this case. I think he may have spoken too early - not realizing that the "dismemberment" part wasn't being released yet. It could be someone's interpretation of when they removed the bones, when it was an artifact of stirring burning the body. I do think that LEO searching in the firepit is more evidence they were looking for missing pieces of bone or teeth. We know 1 body was burned (we assume that to be Tylee) and the burning would happen in the firepit & CD confirmed burning that day.
It makes sense to me that whoever did the burning might try and stir the fire to get it to burn hotter - especially over specific evidence they would want to hide, destroy, or cover up.
 
  • #219
WARNING GRAPHIC
I think Nate got insider info from LEO on the ground. He has been first responder (or someone on his team) on nearly every event in this case. I think he may have spoken too early - not realizing that the "dismemberment" part wasn't being released yet. It could be someone's interpretation of when they removed the bones, when it was an artifact of stirring burning the body. I do think that LEO searching in the firepit is more evidence they were looking for missing pieces of bone or teeth. We know 1 body was burned (we assume that to be Tylee) and the burning would happen in the firepit & CD confirmed burning that day.
It makes sense to me that whoever did the burning might try and stir the fire to get it to burn hotter - especially over specific evidence they would want to hide, destroy, or cover up.

Right. I don't know why this seems less heinous than the thought of using a saw or ax for dismemberment. IMO
 
  • #220
and i still maintain she was a bad seed..causing trouble for years!
Having been on her 5th husband by the age of 46, I'd have to agree. Not a good record of longevity in marriages.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
61
Guests online
2,288
Total visitors
2,349

Forum statistics

Threads
633,149
Messages
18,636,410
Members
243,412
Latest member
9hf6u
Back
Top