If you agree or disagree with the verdict, let us know why

Status
Not open for further replies.
Other than GA's statement that he heard crackling, was there ever evidence entered that suggested 100's to 1000's of maggots were present? :sick:

BTW deviled, if your ears/fingers were burning...it's cause I mentioned you on another thread in reference to the fact that you have had doubts and expressed them here for a long, long time now...you are not in the category of those that jumped on board late and tackled the rest of us as if we know nothing except the good word of NancyG. As much as we disagree, I appreciate that about your participation here.

I was trying to find the actual documents/reports for Casey's trunk, because I know I read somewhere that there were maggots in a plastic food container (100s I believe), but came across this older thread and thought it was interesting.... http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=69646&highlight=maggots



Found it! http://blogs.discovery.com/files/18530237.pdf Pg. 4
 
I was trying to find the actual documents/reports for Casey's trunk, because I know I read somewhere that there were maggots in a plastic food container (100s I believe), but came across this older thread and thought it was interesting.... http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=69646&highlight=maggots



Found it! http://blogs.discovery.com/files/18530237.pdf Pg. 4

I hate to quote myself, but I found a link to the Entomologist Report regarding the trash bag, all the maggots, etc etc.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/15084977/Forensic-Entymology-Report
 
:rocker: Yep and remember this, the night after she killed her child, she went to blockbuster, walked arm and arm with her bf and went back to his house to watch a movie. She also slept there that night.
She had no conscience....still doesn't.

IIRC, it was the same night, not EVEN the night after.
 
Say what you (anyone) will about HLN , but Politan has been on fire since the verdict. He still can't wrap his brain around what happened. I even like listening to him now. lol

I still can't wrap my brain around what happened OR the fact that CFCA and her family have any supporters at all. :confused: Much less the investigative reporter type.
 
I could be very wrong with this, but I thought Lee wasn't allowed to run tests with the evidence. I could be remembering this completely wrong, so forgive me if I am.

I don't think it was that he wasn't allowed to. I think the DT just never did any testing. They knew there was no reason to and I suspect the Lee told them so.
 
Here's one somewhat small thing that still bugs me.

CA testified that in the back yard where the dogs alerted and LE dug up the ground, that grass will no longer grow there for some unknown reason and has now been paved over.

Everybody smelled decomp in the truck of the car. Dogs alerted in a big way on the trunk of the car. Death band hair in trunk of car. FCA was the only one who had access to the car.

Neighbor testified that FCA borrowed a shovel a few days after Caylee is gone.

The DT's bug guy (name??) just happened to let it slip out when testifying that grass WILL NOT GROW in an area where there has been decomposition.

Now if the jury couldn't put these very simple facts together to arrive at a conclusion that Caylee had been in the truck, was moved to the back yard where she considered burying her but didn't for whatever reason but left decomp there, and then deposited her in the swamp, then something is very very wrong.

Just not brain surgery to connect these few facts IMO. Any just maybe had they taken the time to actually go through the evidence instead of being so focused on the DT SO and GA who was not on trial, they would have returned a different verdict. :twocents:

And no I do not have to respect their verdict and never will.
 
It was posted that GA drove the Sunfire between 6/16/08 and 6/27/08 ... can someone please post that source here ? Tks
 
It was posted that GA drove the Sunfire between 6/16/08 and 6/27/08 ... can someone please post that source here ? Tks

I've never heard that. Have always heard/seen that only FCA did. GA and CA didn't even know where FCA was during the 31 days. The only time GA drove the car was from the tow yard on 7/15.
 
I've never heard that. Have always heard/seen that only FCA did. GA and CA didn't even know where FCA was during the 31 days. The only time GA drove the car was from the tow yard on 7/15.
I vaguely remember someone saying GA was chasing FCA down the 408 and GA was driving the Sunfire - I might be mistaken.
 
Say what you (anyone) will about HLN , but Politan has been on fire since the verdict. He still can't wrap his brain around what happened. I even like listening to him now. lol

Your post caught my attention. I may watch him, I like hearing there is someone in the media who isn't going along with everyone else. I haven't watch any of the shows on HLN or IS for a very long time. I'm so tired of hearing "the jury made their decision, you just have to accept/respect it"
 
Here's one somewhat small thing that still bugs me.

CA testified that in the back yard where the dogs alerted and LE dug up the ground, that grass will no longer grow there for some unknown reason and has now been paved over.

Everybody smelled decomp in the truck of the car. Dogs alerted in a big way on the trunk of the car. Death band hair in trunk of car. FCA was the only one who had access to the car.

Neighbor testified that FCA borrowed a shovel a few days after Caylee is gone.

The DT's bug guy (name??) just happened to let it slip out when testifying that grass WILL NOT GROW in an area where there has been decomposition.

Now if the jury couldn't put these very simple facts together to arrive at a conclusion that Caylee had been in the truck, was moved to the back yard where she considered burying her but didn't for whatever reason but left decomp there, and then deposited her in the swamp, then something is very very wrong.

Just not brain surgery to connect these few facts IMO. Any just maybe had they taken the time to actually go through the evidence instead of being so focused on the DT SO and GA who was not on trial, they would have returned a different verdict. :twocents:

And no I do not have to respect their verdict and never will.



BBM

I understood CA to say they took all of the grass out of the backyard because they couldn't grow anymore.

Either way, I also found that statement odd.
 
It was posted that GA drove the Sunfire between 6/16/08 and 6/27/08 ... can someone please post that source here ? Tks

The only time I ever heard that was a post regarding TL's statement. Apparently (I never saw it myself) TL stated that GA had the car at some point during that time getting it fixed. (Possibly Casey stating this when the car was towed? Not sure though).
 
I vaguely remember someone saying GA was chasing FCA down the 408 and GA was driving the Sunfire - I might be mistaken.

I thought GA chased Casey down the 408 with her driving her mother's car, but him in his own vehicle. :waitasec:
 
The only time I ever heard that was a post regarding TL's statement. Apparently (I never saw it myself) TL stated that GA had the car at some point during that time getting it fixed. (Possibly Casey stating this when the car was towed? Not sure though).

But that was just a lie she told TL. Told it to him when he was in NY when he asked about the broken down car left at Amscot. GA never drove the car during that time.
 
BBM

I understood CA to say they took all of the grass out of the backyard because they couldn't grow anymore.

Either way, I also found that statement odd.

I'm pretty sure she specifically said the are that LE dug up.
 
Say what you (anyone) will about HLN , but Politan has been on fire since the verdict. He still can't wrap his brain around what happened. I even like listening to him now. lol

Of course he's on fire, the more stuff he throws out there, the longer the show goes on, and the more exposure he gets, That's the name of the game, isn't it, sensationalism, face time, ratings. I just let 'em rave, elsewhere, my TV is turned off.
 
But that was just a lie she told TL. Told it to him when he was in NY when he asked about the broken down car left at Amscot. GA never drove the car during that time.

Yes, I understand that was a lie.

That was the only time I've seen/heard a reference to GA using her car during that period of time.
 
:rocker: Yep and remember this, the night after she killed her child, she went to blockbuster, walked arm and arm with her bf and went back to his house to watch a movie. She also slept there that night.
She had no conscience....still doesn't.

And for those who believe Caylee drowned in the pool (accidently of course), FCA still did the same things.
 
This is one those posts that clicking on the "thanks" icon is just not enough.
Thank you very much for a great post and I agree 100% with it.


My head has been whirling as I read each post on this thread to see if I might have missed some valid points made by those who agree with the jury.
I guess I am just too old and stubborn (I'm 74) to change my ideas about right and wrong. The word "law" used to lead to the word "legal" to me. In a court of law with a judge and jury, people were supposed to tell the truth, not be able to make obscene accusations and get away with it. I guess that is why I am so very outraged with this jury verdict.
JB made some outrageous and despicable excuses for what he stated really happened to Caylee Marie, and he wasn't required to substantiate any of it. He wove a disjointed and evil tale, painting GA as a molester and FCA as a silent victim. He deliberately shifted the focus of this trial from FCA to GA. Of course GA looked shamed, hung his head. Wouldn't you, if you had done those things JB spoke of. But JB got away with making those accusations in his opening statement.
I am angry that after three years this is the defense from the DT. It was dirty with sexual molestation in graphic detail, which shocked most of the courtroom. This was unproven, but it caught the bored jury's attention it stuck better than thinking about that darn duct tape which had been wrapped around Caylee Marie’s nose and mouth. And, how did that DT doc that broke little Caylee Marie’s skull when he sawed it apart explain the duct tape? Do people really believe that someone took Caylee Marie’s skull from where it was dumped and reattached the mandible. What about all that plant growth that had grown through Caylee Marie’s skull, was embedded in her hair, her blanket and the bags she had been dumped in. The Forensic Botanist that the DT brought on board was clearly not capable of expert testimony in this case. Did you catch that part where she said in her deposition that she had only seen plant growth growing through bone when she was young, and that was from some chicken bones she saw in her mother’s garden. Chicken bones. Did the jury pay any attention to these depositions from the so-called defense experts. They never read them. They only heard what the DT wanted these experts to say.
Like they say, you can't un-ring the bell. JB threw out this crap, knew this, it was his only chance, and he dared to go ahead with it. Why this isn't illegal is beyond my comprehension. He didn’t have to even back up any of those accusations. How can that be allowed. This trial became a trial by perjury, not a trial by jury. Caylee Marie deserved justice, and this was a farce. It proved that you really can get away with murder, and make money from it too.
IMO (Sorry for my lack of writing skills. I am aware of it, can’t think in paragraphs and my OCD just won’t let go of this ugly event.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
127
Guests online
417
Total visitors
544

Forum statistics

Threads
626,115
Messages
18,520,724
Members
240,944
Latest member
blue37
Back
Top