Well, they dont have to worry about housing. They are more than likely have a guarantee for a cot and 3 hots for the rest of their lives. No worries....jmo
And the stainless steel appliance package!
Well, they dont have to worry about housing. They are more than likely have a guarantee for a cot and 3 hots for the rest of their lives. No worries....jmo
BBM. Most folks do that in their Will. She'd still have to pay the mortgage. Him being a lawyer stopped paying the mortgage which is he lost the house.
They should’ve done this a long time ago. It would’ve been easier for all involved, including herself. There’s people out there who would’ve loved to have that sweet boy.
And the stainless steel appliance package!
Any parent in same situation needs to give their kids up. Then party all they want, live how they like, just leave the kids and dogs out of it.
I wonder when the house was neat if that is when they had live ins? Bet so.
Any parent in same situation needs to give their kids up. Then party all they want, live how they like, just leave the kids and dogs out of it.
I wonder when the house was neat if that is when they had live ins? Bet so.
They should’ve done this a long time ago. It would’ve been easier for all involved, including herself. There’s people out there who would’ve loved to have that sweet boy.
ITA! This story upsets me. Both parents. Here lately I’ve been seeing the girlfriend of the boyfriend of a child which is disgusting as well, but both parents allowed this. Disturbing. However, I somewhat feel Drew wanted him to be found. He did not cover his steps well at all. I wonder if he was scared of JC or if she had more on him. Didn’t he take his cell phone with him to the location even?
If the father doesn't care enough to seek parentage rights on his own, the court isn't going to waste taxpayer money it doesn't have tracking him down. If the father is the deadbeat, abusive boyfriend/thief there is no way he'd be given access to the child.
JMO
True, if the baby is born and the father is not on the certificate then it will be incumbent on the person who believes they are the father to seek out paternity. That said, it is a high profile case where the father will not be able to attend the birth potentially. Not sure why this has become contentious.
I should have been clearer that I totally agree with you. Sorry.Exactly what I wrote in my first response to you. With the exception that it is incumbent on the person who thinks they are the father to pursue. From my post #148,
Exactly what I wrote in my first response to you. With the exception that it is incumbent on the person who thinks they are the father to pursue. From my post #148,
@MyBelle and @kaen
You may have missed this post.
The Illinois Supreme Court took away a child because the Judge didn't look for the father after the child was adopted. The adoptive parents must have been devastated.,
Here's an Illinois case, that the Illinois Supreme Court Overturned an Adoption because the judge did not look for the father and then when found said he was unfit. The IDC ruled the judge wrote his own law....
THE TROUBLING CASE OF BABY RICHARD
At the center of the case is the 3 1/2-year-old boy known as Richard, who was given up for adoption in 1991 by his mother. She, however, refused to divulge the name of the father, and he never consented to the adoption. When he sought his legal rights to his son, a circuit judge ruled him unfit on technical grounds and granted the adoption.
On Thursday, the Illinois Supreme Court overturned the adoption, ruling that the lower courts had erred in finding the father unfit. Barring further appeals, Richard is to be removed from his adoptive parents and go to live with his biological parents, of whose existence he reportedly is unaware.
The Supreme Court found it impossible to overlook Appellate Judge Dom Rizzi's attempt to write broad, new case law to justify the adoption in his 1993 opinion. Rizzi's expansion of the concept of the "best interests" of the child and adaptation of abuse and neglect law to an adoption case were unwarranted.
Thank you!
I find it interesting the DCFS reports fail to mention room mates or boarders living in the home.
In retrospect, I now think when the house was in order, a tenant cleaned it. Jmo
Parents sentenced to prison for starving 6-year-old to death in Southern Illinois
Here’s another murder of a child over a potty accident.
Good point! They had to pay her rent and clean up after her, maybe. She got a sweet deal! LolI find it interesting the DCFS reports fail to mention room mates or boarders living in the home.
In retrospect, I now think when the house was in order, a tenant cleaned it. Jmo
I will never and I don’t want to understand these parents minds. How can someone be so cruel? Once again, give the child up. People need to quit being selfish. If you don’t want to take care of a child, don’t have one.