We armchair quarterback every situation that comes up, this one's no different. I have all the respect in the world for her, especially because she managed to walk away without killing anyone.
Me too. It's amazing what she did and I wish instead of twisting it into how afraid she was they would use it to show how brave she was.
They are not twisting anything. She stated she was afraid to use her gun due to the backlash and what it would do to her city and family.
Who is twisting what exactly?
Bringing up an old case because it was said if this officer was being beaten, nobody would object to lethal force.
History shows that is wrong.
People react FIRST before the facts come out.
If this officer had shot him, I guarantee you there would have been protests (peaceful and not), eye witnesses giving incorrect versions of events, news footage of grieving family members saying he was a teddy bear that didn't have a violent bone in his body, calls for the mayor and police chief to resign... I could go on and on.
And all of this would have occurred BEFORE any facts were known or any investigation could be conducted.
THAT IS WHAT SHE FEARED.
Many people could give two chits about the truth. And everybody reading this knows this is how it would have gone down. Whether they want to admit it or not.
JMO
Please refer me to a case where an officer was being severely beaten and used lethal force that turned into protests and incorrect eye witness accounts?
Where did SHE state that. I must have missed it.
We armchair quarterback every situation that comes up, this one's no different. I have all the respect in the world for her, especially because she managed to walk away without killing anyone.
Actually, she didn't walk away. She was carried away on a stretcher.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
She SURVIVED without killing anyone. Jesus. You know very well what was meant by that, c'mon.
She survived with lifelong painful injuries. But it is just wonderful that she didn't hurt the lovely man that was beating her head against the pavement. He got to live another day, to make all of his court appearances for his prior violent crimes against society. God forbid she harmed a hair on his lovely head. That would be just tragic.
That's called justice. Better he have to face his crimes and pay for them than be made a martyr.
That's called justice. Better he have to face his crimes and pay for them than be made a martyr.
And had he shot, this would be a whole different thread wondering why they didn't "just shoot him in the leg or arm." GMAFB
You're right unless the perp was white. There would be no protests and no thread. The cops would be saying thank goodness he was white and it's sad they have to think that.
This is simply not true. There have been protests for white victims of police violence, and there are a lot of threads here about white victims of police violence.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?315456-Trooper-shoots-deaf-man
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...t-and-killed-by-police-responding-to-911-call
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...19-fatally-shot-by-Fresno-police-25-June-2016
Etc.
And JMO but "Thank goodness he was white" is a rather revolting thought to randomly attribute to LEOs.
I have never seen massive protests, with freeways shut down, and police stations invaded, in any cases of white victims shot by the police. I must have missed them.
And because of that you believe police officers are relieved when they shoot a white person?