- Joined
- Nov 20, 2015
- Messages
- 480
- Reaction score
- 2,750
It's not fair to say he's dead when there's no evidence of that. You can speculate that he could be dead, even likely dead but nobody can say for certain.There’s circumstantial evidence. Lots of it. She was going through a major depression. there was blood that was Timmothy’s and circumstantially, we could argue it’s from murder. Her car tires indicated flat land soil with queen Anne’s lace, suggesting a field. Her clothes that she wore out that day were missing. Then there’s how long he’s been missing, no one has seen a strange Child show up at someone’s house missing his birth certificate, social security number, or other important things. He couldn’t have been enrolled in school without noticeable trouble. Timmothy himself was old enough to possibly remember and the crime hasn’t exactly been low profile. He’d be over 18 now. And the people taking him in wouldn’t have been very good or safe parents if they went through with this plan as she planned it. The sheer fact there’s been nothing strange, no sightings, nothing, in itself is circumstantial evidence he’s dead. Personally, that’s why I think Stacy Rudolph is dead too. In both cases we’re talking about an incredibly, absurdly entitled mentally unbalanced person who put her wants ahead of her child’s. Given all that and especially how long he’s been missing, I think it’s fair to say he’s dead. MOO
I’m sure we all would like to see him be alive, but if you take a step back - and remember we’re not a court of law who can only accept some types of evidence - he is probably deceased.
None of that means he's dead with certainty. All of that can be explained away. The blood was from something else, not a murder. The soil was from her being in a field perhaps sure, where she met and handed off her son to someone. He hasn't come forward because just like many others, they are brainwashed after years. There's plenty of examples of this. If he's within the amish community, he wouldn't need a birth certificate or SSN etc.
What I wrote above is just as possible as what you wrote given the evidence there is (not much).
Or she could have hid Tim in such a remote area that he will never be found? Why would she kill herself if she had nothing to do with Tim's vanishing and alleged death?
Satch
She killed herself because she was depressed but wanted her son to have a better life and didn't think his father could provide that? She found someone to provide it. The multiple trips to the area where her found was found could be evidence of this. Of course, it would also be evidence of her trying to find a good spot to bury her son after killing him too but one possibility is not more likely than the other.