IL - Veterinarian distributed CSAM on social media; claimed he planned to sexually abuse baby after it was born - Mar 25, 2024

  • #121
This article describes the defendant's desire for pre-trial release but I can't find any updates. the article is dated May 5, 2025.
https://chronicleillinois.com/news/...-vet-held-on-child-🤬🤬🤬🤬-charge-seeks-release/

ETA no clue why my links aren't linking correctly
 
  • #122
  • #123
https://chronicleillinois.com/news/...nment-defense-spar-as-child-🤬🤬🤬🤬-trial-looms/

Why are these links not working here? I’ve asked mods about it.

Trial started June 8th.

Cannot find anything about it but he was in custody until the trial.
 
  • #124
  • #125
The links are not working because certain words are censored here.

But the words are blocked out, so the rest of the article should be able to be read.


Okay, now that a hockey item can go through, perhaps you are correct. Thanks

But if we can read about all kinds of murder and mayhem, why can we not read about the trial of this most heinous character?
 
  • #126
Last edited:
  • #127
The words are censored in the URL address too, making it unusable.

Yes, I realize that. We’d still like to know how his trial is going abnd the outcome.
 
  • #128
Yes, I realize that. We’d still like to know how his trial is going abnd the outcome.
Using TinyURL works for links.
 
  • #129
*
 
  • #130
The words are censored in the URL address too, making it unusable.

Test: Government, defense spar as child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 trial looms - Chronicle Media

 
  • #131
The defense moved to bar chats “regarding alleged sexual conduct with Mr. King’s unborn son, other minors, an alleged collection of child 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 and ‘pervs …’” as being “completely irrelevant.” 

The defense also moved to bar the prosecution from introducing any chats referencing his son, any chats “describing alleged contact or stated desire to have contact with minors or interest in minors.”

The content of those chats, King’s defense lawyers contend, have no probative value and could be highly prejudicial and “would only inflame the emotions of the jury.”


"your honor, my client is such a worthless human specimen and his alleged crimes against children are so heinous we don't want the jury to see any of the mountain of evidence of said crimes against children because the jury will immediately find him guilty of said crimes and that's not fair." Waaaaah
 
Last edited:

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
101
Guests online
2,578
Total visitors
2,679

Forum statistics

Threads
632,864
Messages
18,632,786
Members
243,317
Latest member
Sfebruary
Back
Top