kgeaux
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2003
- Messages
- 7,598
- Reaction score
- 34
Tom'sGirl said:I'm asking you kgeaux since I hang on to every post you make. Living on the West Coast all we've been seeing today on T.V. is that beautiful area with so many of the homeowners who say the have running water, telephone and no damage to their homes.
They said IF they left their homes would only be looted or burned down. The the camera panned to a huge house that was burned down.
Do you think they will force them to leave?
I think the minute they try to force a person with means out of their home, a lawyer will be called, an injunction will be filed and this is going to hit the courts. There is some disagreement as to whether the state actually has the authority to inforce this, and it'll have to be argued out at some point. And God help us all if forces show up and force a monied person out at gun point. We won't ever hear the end of that.
If there are people who have running water that is not contaminated, it'd be hard to declare their home unfit to live in and hard to say that it poses a hazard to public health. If the authorities can't prove that, then they can't force anyone out.
Poor people with no resources, they'll probably clear them out before they ever go to the first house that is occupied by someone who can fight them in the courts.
And, just to be clear, the people whose homes are contaminated with that toxic water, I hope they all chose to leave because I believe they'll die if they don't. I want their pets rescued, God it breaks my heart when I see those dogs and cats out in that water.