Having been around the houses on extremely excruciating spreadsheeted detail on the Pistorius timeline, I am not tempted to get into the weeds on that until we get more detailed witness evidence and the prosecution/defence theories. The exact details in evidence are what matter rather than what is in the PCA.
To me the broad sweep of the evidence is more important at this stage i.e
1. the 3 juveniles and RA report seeing each other - which gives us some decent timings
2. The woman walker sees bridge guy, then turns and sees the victims a short time later
On any read, it is difficult to see where RA could have been, so as not to have seen woman walker and also not see the victims, and also not see Bridge Guy
I am most interested how he attempted to explain all this, in the course of 3 interviews, more than I am in the PCA itself.
IMO the evolution of his story will be key.