- Joined
- May 20, 2013
- Messages
- 5,478
- Reaction score
- 53,429
It screams of incompetence.Court appointed defense resigns after everything that has happened until now? This screams corruption, somewhere. JMO
MOO
It screams of incompetence.Court appointed defense resigns after everything that has happened until now? This screams corruption, somewhere. JMO
I think they purposely threw that 'Hail Mary' Memorandum and it backfired in spectacular fashion. I wonder if we will ever know if they get sanctioned over that?I think RA will be pleading guilty sooner rather than later when new attorneys look at things.
The ex-defense attorneys were the only ones preventing that in my opinion. They chose to play games instead of doing what was best for their client.
Agree.
They could have quit last week, not wait till the last minute.
Maybe now we can take down the circus tent and RA can get proper representation, and Libby and Abby can have their day in court…though delayed…free of manufactured drama.
You cannot undo the damage. There is no way RA gets a fair trial with this all floating around out there. They've made a huge mess of this and honestly should be disbarred.So what happens with the Franks report for example ?
Will that ridiculous line of defense be thrown with out when new lawyers come on board? But then if his new defense team go a new route then that report is out there that everybody has seen and read so how do you undo that damage?
mooo
You cannot undo the damage. There is no way RA gets a fair trial with this all floating around out there. They've made a huge mess of this and honestly should be disbarred.
You cannot undo the damage. There is no way RA gets a fair trial with this all floating around out there. They've made a huge mess of this and honestly should be disbarred.
10/19/2023 | Affidavit Filed Affidavit Filed By: Allen, Richard M. File Date: 10/18/2023 |
Has anyone seen this floating around on the net?
10/19/2023 Affidavit Filed
Affidavit
Filed By: Allen, Richard M.
File Date: 10/18/2023
Thank you. Have you ever seen this one? I'm really curious what the judge's reason was.No, I believe it is sealed.
11/03/2022 | Order Issued Order of Recusal and Certification to the Indiana Supreme Court for Selection of a Special Judge Outside of Carroll County entered, per form. (copy to Indiana Supreme Court) Judicial Officer: Diener, Benjamin A. Noticed: McLeland, Nicholas Charles Noticed: Allen, Richard M. Order Signed: 11/03/2022 |
When it came out that the crime scene evidence leak came from connections to the defense, I pondered if it was a ploy to get taken off the case. That the evidence against RA was just so damning that they couldn't defend him. The fact that they've now quit makes me lean back to believing RA is indeed the right guy.
MOO He can get a fair trial. The jury will listen to and weigh what is presented in court.You cannot undo the damage. There is no way RA gets a fair trial with this all floating around out there. They've made a huge mess of this and honestly should be disbarred.
Think I’ll wait before passing judgement. A lot to take in. I’d certainly like to see the departing attorneys interviewed and asked for comment as to why they took this dramatic action to withdraw (and why they left it right up to the wire with their client and the victims families in the courtroom).
Possibly the head of the public defender's office?I will add - something odd has happened here. Take a step back and consider how it is that an attorney has resigned from defending without it going through court procedure…
Judge Gull looked unprepared and a little taken aback, but she said something with significance I don’t yet fully understand when she said ‘this was outside of their control..’. Who is ‘their’ in this instance?
There’s more to this.
Addiction to playing defense as a game.First the memo, then the leak, I think you're right. I think this all started with RA started confessing to his wife & mom.
I think the defense should have walked away when RA confessed and now I really wonder why they didn't.
MOO He can get a fair trial. The jury will listen to and weigh what is presented in court.
I think juiries understand the court of media is all over the place and has entirely different motivations than seeking justice.