IN - Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #172

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #161
New entry into RA's case
11/20/2023Order Granting
Order granting Motion to Withdraw
Noticed: McLeland, Nicholas Charles
Noticed: Scremin, Robert Cliff
Noticed: Lebrato, William Santino
Noticed: Luttrull, James David JR
Order Signed: 11/17/2023
Is this AB and BR withdrawals?
 
  • #162
Is this AB and BR withdrawals?

My guess, she‘s now popped out.

11/02/2023Appearance Filed
Limited Appearance of Cara Schaefer Wieneke
For Party:
Allen, Richard M.
File Stamp:
11/02/2023
 
  • #163
  • #164
11/03/2023Motion to Withdraw Appearance Filed
Motion to Withdraw Appearance
Filed By:
Indiana Department of Correction
File Stamp:
11/03/2023
Who is this motion for?
 
  • #165
11/03/2023Motion to Withdraw Appearance Filed
Motion to Withdraw Appearance
Filed By:
Indiana Department of Correction
File Stamp:
11/03/2023
Who is this motion for?
I don't know.
 
  • #166
This is what I see for his murder case :

State of Indiana v. Richard M. Allen​

Case Number08C01-2210-MR-000001
CourtCarroll Circuit Court
TypeMR - Murder
Filed10/28/2022
Status10/28/2022 , Pending (active)
RelatedLower Trial Court Case
22S-SJ-00369
Lower Trial Court Case
23S-OR-00302

Parties to the Case​

Hide all party details
DefendantAllen, Richard M.
Attorney
Robert Cliff Scremin
#3109902, Lead, Court Appointed
Attorney address
116 E Berry ST
STE 1200
Fort Wayne, IN 46802
Attorney phone
260-494-0606(W)

Attorney
William Santino Lebrato
#2170702, Court Appointed
Attorney address
116 E Berry ST
STE 500
Fort Wayne, IN 46802
State PlaintiffState of Indiana
Attorney
Nicholas Charles McLeland
#2830008, Lead
Attorney address
101 W. Main St.
Suite 204
Delphi, IN 46923
Attorney phone
765-564-4514(W)

Attorney
James David Luttrull Jr.
#1001827
Attorney address
101 E 4th ST
RM 107
Marion, IN 46952
 
  • #167
11/03/2023Motion to Withdraw Appearance Filed
Motion to Withdraw Appearance
Filed By:
Indiana Department of Correction
File Stamp:
11/03/2023
Who is this motion for?
This is the only appearance filed for the DOC so I'm thinking it's these two.
06/20/2023Appearance Filed
Appearance by Attorneys - Aaron M. Ridlen; Hannah M. Deters
For Party:
Indiana Department of Correction
File Stamp:
06/19/2023
 
  • #168
I think it might be this. The lawyer Deters was representing the DOC.

1700501165497.jpeg
 
  • #169
I think it might be this. The lawyer Deters was representing the DOC.

View attachment 462460
@Jurisprudence answered my question about that here:
I'm not sure I understand the Q but maybe this will help? The subpoena was served on the prison. The state is in charge of the prison system so that's why your'e seeing the motion to quash being authored by the AG's office. They aren't parties. They were served a subpoena and the state's attorneys (the AG's office) made a motion to get rid of it (quash it) so they wouldn't have to comply. Is that what you were wondering?
 
  • #170
@Jurisprudence answered my question about that here:

Thanks but I didn’t really have any questions about it.
 
  • #171
That's nothing unusual. IMO. People interview all the time with LE of their own free will and then stop when they lawyer up. Not cooperating with LE after arrest and then asking for council is I'm sure fairly common. Do you think RA's Miranda rights were violated? That's never been stated by the defense, as far as I'm aware?
That wasn't the unusual part. The part that was worth noting IMO was where they knew he was being shipped off to DOC several days prior to when the motion to transfer request was filed. In fact, the article updated on Oct. 30 claimed he was already there.

I'm wondering how much his failure to cooperate influenced the decision to transfer him, without the proper motions and without the benefit of an atty. Additionally, I haven't found any paperwork noting his move to White Co.
 
  • #172
Thanks but I didn’t really have any questions about it.
I realize that. I thought, that by adding it to your post, it might be less confusing to others if they knew why they were named.

I still have time to edit. Would you like me to remove it. I can make it a separate post.
 
  • #173
This is what I see for his murder case :

State of Indiana v. Richard M. Allen​

Case Number08C01-2210-MR-000001
CourtCarroll Circuit Court
TypeMR - Murder
Filed10/28/2022
Status10/28/2022 , Pending (active)
RelatedLower Trial Court Case
22S-SJ-00369
Lower Trial Court Case
23S-OR-00302

Parties to the Case​

Hide all party details
DefendantAllen, Richard M.
Attorney
Robert Cliff Scremin
#3109902, Lead, Court Appointed
Attorney address
116 E Berry ST
STE 1200
Fort Wayne, IN 46802
Attorney phone
260-494-0606(W)

Attorney
William Santino Lebrato
#2170702, Court Appointed
Attorney address
116 E Berry ST
STE 500
Fort Wayne, IN 46802
State PlaintiffState of Indiana
Attorney
Nicholas Charles McLeland
#2830008, Lead
Attorney address
101 W. Main St.
Suite 204
Delphi, IN 46923
Attorney phone
765-564-4514(W)

Attorney
James David Luttrull Jr.
#1001827
Attorney address
101 E 4th ST
RM 107
Marion, IN 46952
When you search by attorney, Greenlee, Kevin, criminal case, do you see this?
1700503058298.png
 
  • #174
When you search by attorney, Greenlee, Kevin, criminal case, do you see this?
View attachment 462466
The only think I can think of is that motion he made for public access.

06/08/2023Appearance Filed
Limited Appearance of Attoney
For Party: MYSTERY SHEET LLC DBA MURDER SHEET
File Stamp: 06/08/2023
06/08/2023Motion Filed
Motion for Public Access to Court Records
Filed By: MYSTERY SHEET LLC DBA MURDER SHEET
File Stamp: 06/08/2023
 
  • #175
The only think I can think of is that motion he made for public access.

06/08/2023Appearance Filed
Limited Appearance of Attoney
For Party: MYSTERY SHEET LLC DBA MURDER SHEET
File Stamp: 06/08/2023
06/08/2023Motion Filed
Motion for Public Access to Court Records
Filed By: MYSTERY SHEET LLC DBA MURDER SHEET
File Stamp: 06/08/2023
Good find! (You know where I’m going with this. :) )
Is Greenlee not bound by the gag order?


A gag order is a court order banning designated persons, such as attorneys, parties, family members, and other involved parties, from talking to the media or public about the case.
 
  • #176
That wasn't the unusual part. The part that was worth noting IMO was where they knew he was being shipped off to DOC several days prior to when the motion to transfer request was filed. In fact, the article updated on Oct. 30 claimed he was already there.

I'm wondering how much his failure to cooperate influenced the decision to transfer him, without the proper motions and without the benefit of an atty. Additionally, I haven't found any paperwork noting his move to White Co.
RA didn't have the benefit of an attorney because he denied himself legal representation at his initial hearing after arrest. He said he would be hiring his own attorney.

It was weeks later when he wrote "throwing himself on the mercy of the court" that he didn't realize how expensive it was and needed a public defender appointed.

MOO
 
  • #177
Good find! (You know where I’m going with this. :) )
Is Greenlee not bound by the gag order?


A gag order is a court order banning designated persons, such as attorneys, parties, family members, and other involved parties, from talking to the media or public about the case.
I think MS had done enough 'talking' about this case already. I hope Greenlee is bound by the gag order, I think they have created problems whether intentional or not.

JMO
 
  • #178
Good find! (You know where I’m going with this. :) )
Is Greenlee not bound by the gag order?


A gag order is a court order banning designated persons, such as attorneys, parties, family members, and other involved parties, from talking to the media or public about the case.
That's a good question. I don't think he's considered an "involved person" just because he's an attorney.
However, if we consider who their inside sources are, then ???
 
  • #179
Anyone taking bets on when the (eventual) trial will be if there is one?

I'll take a stab and say October of 2024
 
  • #180
Anyone taking bets on when the (eventual) trial will be if there is one?

I'll take a stab and say October of 2024


I am leaning towards a plea deal, but I agree that if it goes to trial, it will be October 2024.

JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
156
Guests online
2,678
Total visitors
2,834

Forum statistics

Threads
632,132
Messages
18,622,552
Members
243,031
Latest member
beccabelle70
Back
Top