DeletedYep, not that. I agree it’s a jumbled up mess of blue jeans caught at the wrong moment to look like that. It might be a clue... don’t know. (That his pants are too big)
DeletedYep, not that. I agree it’s a jumbled up mess of blue jeans caught at the wrong moment to look like that. It might be a clue... don’t know. (That his pants are too big)
Yes absolutely.No DNA in urine is there?
A profile can be obtained from urine. Over time bacteria in urine can degrade DNA, so fresh or frozen urine is the best type of sample to test.Nope
Didn't Libby's Grandfather or Father say he called a friend who was a police (ex?) officer for advice when he first realized the girls were missing?Maybe an Ex-LE talked to one of his "colleagues", who is a Non-Ex, in a friendly and "conspiratorial" (not recognizable to the officer) way on behalf of a man, please not to involve the poor innocent guy in a "circus" like that, because of reputation.
The poor innocent man (with the looks of NBG) had to have been around the area and around that specific time of course, maybe got interviewed briefly with a lot of respect. Otherwise he wouldn't have needed an advocate, if he hadn't been there. MOO
Alright, I accept that he's not walking naturally due to the condition of the bridge. The question then remains, why even release the video if it provides no further help in identifying him. The still shot was sufficient.“Because of the deteriorated condition of the bridge, the suspect is not walking naturally.”
7:27 mark.
Look up firemen and axes, there's a leather cover/carrier you can put on your waistband.Oh my word! That's the last thing you'd want to tuck down your trousers. One wrong move and you could slice through the femoral artery and you're toast in minutes!Although, come to think of it, that would have been a blessing in this case.
eta: Naturally, I mean in injuring BG.
Just my opinion, but I think the added brief portion of the video and also the audio "guys" were just there to re-ignite interest in the case. I think the main thing was the new sketch and change of direction. MOOAlright, I accept that he's not walking naturally due to the condition of the bridge. The question then remains, why even release the video if it provides no further help in identifying him. The still shot was sufficient.
Agree, there must be a relevance.Alright, I accept that he's not walking naturally due to the condition of the bridge. The question then remains, why even release the video if it provides no further help in identifying him. The still shot was sufficient.
Ok. What don't I see -
A young man,
An athletic man
A woman
A non white person
A news boy cap
A tidy man
A clean man
A jogger
A nice man
A friendly man
A fat man
Glasses
Cigarette smoke
Rucksack
Walking stick
That's about it but probably more will come to mind.
He potentially could work in a casino. Not only because of the shift, but because people in casinos don’t pay much attention to workers around them, they are so glued to their slot machines. I don’t gamble - I observed what was going on on the floor, gamblers are so focused on the game, anyone could fly under any radars there. They may pay some attention to the croupiers or people greeting them or giving them out money, but not people on the floor when they are playing.
And casino life is pretty isolating, I think.
(Or a person who lost a lot could be so angry, he’d take it on two innocent people. Not very typical, but happens). MOO
Agree, there must be a relevance.
Alright, I accept that he's not walking naturally due to the condition of the bridge. The question then remains, why even release the video if it provides no further help in identifying him. The still shot was sufficient.
I think right at the beginning they described him in a blue jacket and brown hoody, but that is all I can recall.We all seem to see (or not see) BG's attire differently....wondering, has LE ever clarified in MSM what they 'see', besides an estimated height and weight for BG? Was a description given of his clothing? Was it clarified if he was wearing a hat or fanny bag?
I think right at the beginning they described him in a blue jacket and brown hoody, but that is all I can recall.
The problem with all of this is, on the one hand they're telling us to look at how he walks (gait) and on the other hand they're saying it's not his true gait because of the poor condition of the bridge. Damned if you do and damned if you don't. You can't have it both ways. I don't see how releasing the video helped at all.My opinion: If your closest family member or friend were walking, you'd probably recognize them - even without seeing their face. I know I have seen my partner walk on all sorts of terrain, including stepping over something on the floor in our residence or in a parking lot - or a sidewalk. Same with closest friends. It could be something as simple as the shape of the shoulders or posture. I see some people are hypothesizing that he seems to favor his left leg. If he does, that would help and you wouldn't be able to see that in the still picture. If it helps someone recognize or even just send in a tip then it is useful. IMO.
Hopefully not. I recently read a mystery novel featuring technical forensics and voice recognition. I realize my novel may have placed forensics ahead of where it stands in 2019 but I believe the study of voice recognition could be extremely beneficial in identifying a suspect. I doubt the science is as if this date admissible in court. Lie detectors are not but are still used in investigations.This is such a frustrating case. I really thought they(LE) were close to solving it. I just want justice and closure for the family
Unfortunately, I now think they(LE) have missed and possibly botched many parts of the investigation.
or...be able to stalk people then, either....oy.I wouldn't trust this video to show an accurate representation of his gait, and I am not surprised that he's looking down. He's very high up in the air without any rails, and some of the boards are either rotten or missing altogether. It's very awkward to walk across it.This isn't a place where one would take a casual stroll.
Agree. I can buy the jacket, hat, and even multiple layers if it's chilly. The scarf, though, I have a harder time with. I can get my men to wear gloves, coats, and hats but they rarely don scarves unless they're out there shoveling snow.
The problem with all of this is, on the one hand they're telling us to look at how he walks (gait) and on the other hand they're saying it's not his true gait because of the poor condition of the bridge. Damned if you do and damned if you don't. You can't have it both ways. I don't see how releasing the video helped at all.
With respect to him favouring his left leg, how do we know that if his "gait" is off because he's walking this notoriously precarious bridge? As well, I don't think the video enriched us in identifying his posture in any way. He's somewhat slouched forward and looking down in the pic and video, likely so he doesn't miss a step and fall off (wish the turd had), but also shielding his face from the girls.
JMHO