My thoughts my opinion.Yep, the active imaginations with creating new "facts" is what sends me packing too....
What seems to make you so certain it wasn't?
Everyone is entitled to their opinion
My thoughts my opinion.Yep, the active imaginations with creating new "facts" is what sends me packing too....
Or it could have been a couple that were not BG or the girls. It could in fact be that no one was there which would make it more interesting because someone told DG that. I think misdirection has been a problem here all along and when LE changed direction it was because of misdirection.I can def understand posters' frustration at this case seeming to be almost at a standstill (from our vantage point as non-LE, anyway) ...
... BUT ... I honestly don't understand why some posters' surmising that the "couple" seen under bridge (per witness' words, per DG) is thought by others here to be so outlandish.
I mean, unless you KNOW who (if anyone) was under the bridge, how can you scoff at the idea it could have been the girls, BG, or a combination thereof? It certainly COULD have been, ... no???
Ok so why were they killed?Yeah I have trouble with the idea that they came across illegal activity and were killed because of it.
First, it would have to be someone that knows they know who he is because if it's two stranger young teens, punch them in the face and leave. Worst they do is go to the cops and say "we saw some guy, this big, this color hair, doing whatever" and it'll be real hard to figure out who it was (see how hard it's been to find BG when there's VIDEO of him!!!).
Second, whatever the bad guy is doing, it has to be so bad he'd kill two kids to hide it, yet he's doing it someplace easily accessible in a public area.
And third, whatever he's doing has to be so bad that the girls would turn him in. Are two kids their age going to care so much about drug use they turn some guy in for it? Doubtful.
Or it could have been a couple that were not BG or the girls. It could in fact be that no one was there which would make it more interesting because someone told DG that. I think misdirection has been a problem here all along and when LE changed direction it was because of misdirection.
It disturbs me that when I check on here every day most cases say ARREST and this one doesn't. I have a hard time understanding with an actual picture of the killer they still haven't arrested anyone. I feel like this was a planned attack and someone or many people are covering for him. Small towns usually have big secrets.
I can def understand posters' frustration at this case seeming to be almost at a standstill (from our vantage point as non-LE, anyway) ...
... BUT ... I honestly don't understand why some posters' surmising that the "couple" seen under bridge (per witness' words, per DG) is thought by others here to be so outlandish.
I mean, unless you KNOW who (if anyone) was under the bridge, how can you scoff at the idea it could have been the girls, BG, or a combination thereof? It certainly COULD have been, ... no???
I agree Greg. Once they have caught him, which won't be long IMO, everyone will say "I can't believe he wasn't caught sooner".This is not an easy case it is going to take time. Unfortunately the monster has got lucky with the quality of the images and video taken if there had been a clear photo of his face he would have been caught long ago. I’m not being critical of Liberty in any way when I say this it is remarkable she was able to capture anything of the monster in the horrific situation the girl’s were in. I’m sure the video Liberty took will be used by the prosecution to help convict him one day. He has been “lucky” so far but his luck is going to run out.
Ok so why were they killed?
BG is the killer according to LE. We know others were on the trails but we don't know exact times. We can tie the girls and BG to being on the bridge at a certain time and witnesses at the trails and bridge at certain times. Working out who was where exactly when and why, plus when/if they saw or were BG or accomplices is the bit that LE are trying to solve, so it is not surprising we can't fathom it as we don't even have half the detail that LE have. It is interesting to see others' theories, I agree.So with the theory of coming across some illegal activity, is BG a part of the activity or just a random person they filmed. And if he was a part of the activity, did he bring them down to where it was happening to show them it was happening? How do they get off the bridge to seen something bad happening?
I don't know what happened and want to understand all points of view to better see through others eyes!
Imagine, this secret, small town Delphi has, might be existing only since after the murders ....It disturbs me that when I check on here every day most cases say ARREST and this one doesn't. I have a hard time understanding with an actual picture of the killer they still haven't arrested anyone. I feel like this was a planned attack and someone or many people are covering for him. Small towns usually have big secrets.
Did I really hear him say if you took off the head you'd know the body? Uncle, friend, co-worker etc etc?? Makes me think the sketch is not as important as recognizing the rest of the body.
I think he is EXCEPTIONALLY thin. Noticeable immediately when not disguised. Very stick-thin legs.