- Joined
- Sep 28, 2017
- Messages
- 1,383
- Reaction score
- 14,735
Oh duhWhile I got ya on the line, can you please provide the link again, tia. If not, no worries, I can find it.
eta:
(@Medstudies, old Facebook.)
his old FB... Brian Chadwell
Oh duhWhile I got ya on the line, can you please provide the link again, tia. If not, no worries, I can find it.
eta:
(@Medstudies, old Facebook.)
Wish I could LOVE this post a 1,000 times. LOLIf after all this it turns out that BG actually did have a puppy in his coat I’m going to lose my mind.
Thank you.
I Would think if he was BG LE would have announced it and yet they haven't confirmed or denied, to my knowledge.LE has been cagey around whether they have BG's DNA, but it seems like they do, IMO. For example, in this article from 2019, it says that LE requested DNA from a dead suspect to rule him out, which implies they have DNA on file for the Delphi suspect to compare against: Delphi murder investigators request dead rape suspect's DNA
"According to the Lafayette Journal and Courier, police have requested DNA and autopsy results from 55-year-old Paul Etter"
[...]
"Investigators say the DNA test will rule him out or make him a suspect."
I agree he is BG and then some. mOO
Or they did not have it tested. How many rape kits have gone untested?Someone pointed out earlier that it’s possible his DNA didn’t make it into the database so I am considering that as a viable option. However, if I’m Indiana state police and my case is going cold, wouldn’t I spend the time between 2017 and 2021 pulling DNA from every guy who may fit my profile where I am legally allowed to take their DNA? It seems hard to believe that LE wouldn’t make sure they had samples from everyone legally required to give a sample. So I think the odds are his DNA has been in the database and either he’s not it or there’s no DNA.
I’m sure TikTok would remove, or has some policy, that any videos posted by someone who has been charged with child sexual offenses, violence, murder (“attempted” in JC’s case), etc., will be removed.JCs TikTok account is gone. Wonder who did that? Did TikTok remove it?
.
posted this first in Chadwell thread
As far as this guy matching either of the sketches...we have insisted that quite a few others were a match also.
IMO, there was no one more compelling than DN. He had so many different looks. A very strong case was made for him being BG. His criminal history, where he was when, remember the whole "was he with his wife at her ultrasound or not?" And as we know, he wasn't the guy. So just saying...
And I so hope I'm wrong, if he really IS the guy.
If after all this it turns out that BG actually did have a puppy in his coat I’m going to lose my mind.
You have just stated my exact thoughts on this guy but much more eloquently than I could have. As much as I would love for this to be THE guy (and I wish for the closure of this case more than I wish for almost anything), I am nowhere near convinced.Here’s the issue I posted earlier before discussion was opened up to JBC.
According to the probable cause affidavit, JBC was convicted of a felony in IN in 2016. Indiana law states that anyone convicted of a felony after 2005 must submit DNA to Indiana’s DNA database. This is usually done with a mouth swab or blood sample when someone is being held in prison or during a probation check-in. Section 10(a)(3) 2006 Indiana Code - CHAPTER 6. INDIANA DNA DATA BASE
JBC’s DNA should have been in the Indiana DNA database by 2017.
If they had DNA at Delphi and JBC’s DNA made it into the database as required by law, LE should have already ruled him in or out. I am surprised that LE is making cautious statements. Maybe Kelsie knows this and is why she is asking for calm.
Possibilities:
1. DNA from Delphi and JBC ruled out in 2017
2. DNA from Delphi but JBC DNA not in database due to error
3. No good DNA from Delphi so no answer
If there’s no DNA from Delphi I would be skeptical that JBC is the offender as he seems so messy and disorganized based on his public profiles and attack last week - could he really murder two little girls without leaving even a trace of his DNA? This guy can’t go to the grocery store without having a breakdown on Facebook.
I will be happy but surprised if this is the guy.
After having the misfortune of viewing JC’s shirtless pics on FB for the past week (pass brain bleach and other WS merch), the video of BG upon a quick glance stood out to me in contrast as him being potentially extra bulky - we’ve discussed everything “bulk” and layering before, etc., but wanted to that stuck me when I glanced at it (I’ll be looking at that again, of course, as I am currently crosseyed).And his extra clothing all of his tattoos...
One thing I noticed in the Heavy.com article is that in Item #3, in the photo with the orange shirt, his hands are positioned rather awkwardly in his jeans pockets.Thank you!
I was originally thinking “clean shaved” and now I see where I got mixed up. For reference a clean shaved photo can be seen in the tent picture (wearing the construction beanie) in the article below or on his FB.
James Brian Chadwell: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com
It seems like either they have DNA from the crime scene or Chadwell is BG, but both can't be true. Right?