Per the affidavit, the "ISP case" number is redacted on the first page. I will assume this is the Delphi case because we have since heard that this search warrant was in regards to the Delphi case. As I mentioned yesterday, pg. 2, paragraph 2 talks about KAK's polygraph, and says the questions/answers are based on "case, [redacted]". Since there is no "ISP" or other LE agency listed before "case" in that paragraph, I will again assume this is referring to the same case as listed on pg. 1, likely the Delphi case. Personally, I'm pretty comfortable assuming that until we have more information.
Now, it's been pointed out that some of the deleted data from KAK's iPhone 5 and other devices might not have been available to LE until 2020. But, by Feb. 25, 2017, LE was able to get a search warrant, subpoenas for Comcast, Instagram, and Snapchat, and KAK appears to be answering questions about Delphi directly with admissions of online child




activities. Not to mention his comments about being "f***ed" and packing a bag to leave. That seems like a lot of hints that LE had something already connecting KAK to L and A, but not enough to arrest him, and, in fact, LE tells the press KAK and his dad were "in no way connected" to the crime.
LE announces an ask for anyone who communicated, or
met, with anthony_shots. KAK is not mentioned at all, only connected to the account later through media sources. If LE were truly looking at KAK as BG, would they not also put out a bulletin asking for info regarding him, his whereabouts, anyone he might have talked to about the crime, video, or other evidence to support their case against him? Obviously, someone only in contact with the fake account wouldn't recognize KAK, but people who know KAK would be significant witnesses, as well, imo. I'm just guessing.
I think there's much more to it.