DeDee
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 7,345
- Reaction score
- 42,217
He made false alibis. IMO, because he knew or suspected that he was connected somehow.
There does seem to be some confusion over his Vegas alibi. Whatever he initially gave to investigators must have been convincing enough that they dropped him as a POI.
Police told him that he was the last person to communicate with Libby. I don't know why this information outrages me but it does. They had to have that particular information at least within days of the crime. He and his father were interviewed on FEB 25, according to GHughes.
So, they've spent years checking out KAKs phone and the dropbox link only to now tell us they know who the killer is and an arrest could come within a year ... or before DCs term expires!
even if he was REALLY the last to interact with libby...this still can be have zero relation to the murder..they have to prove a catfishing angle
I still firmly believe its a planned attack and random victims..
a catfishing would def have a trace from that day...and has nothing to do with a reset days before cause the attack happened at a specific given time
creeps like KAK on the other hand will not usually try and meet any victim cause thats why they are using a model profile...to get what they want that way
The catfishing did leave an electronic trail that fateful day. That's how LEO found KAK.
And, KAK did meet with someone. It was one of Libby's younger friends. She is the one who gave Libby the a_shots acct information. *GHughes had the entire conversation of the friend with KAK in March, 2017. Ditto for Law Enforcement. They've had this information for years.
* @ appx the 1:05 mark