Or someone who works part time, sporadically, or not at all. ImoOr anyone who works weekends and typically takes Mondays off. Restaurant staff, retailers, clergy, realtors, etc.
Or someone who works part time, sporadically, or not at all. ImoOr anyone who works weekends and typically takes Mondays off. Restaurant staff, retailers, clergy, realtors, etc.
I wonder if it is an extended family member? Who else knew where they were going that day? Was it common for them to go hiking all alone?
Sisters bf? friend of the family? Someone they recognized or even trusted?
One thing is clear, the PC on Monday was not about sharing information with the public since they made the status as clear as mud to us. They were talking directly to the killer and those in his circle. And sought to generate new interest, tips.And classically on Twitter, two reporters are reporting different interpretations. One says the ISP clarified the sketches are the same man, and the other reporter says they clarified the first released (hat) sketch is no longer a suspect.
No wonder the public is confused. Confounds me how reporters can fail to comprehend reading, and their job is so vital to conveying info!
Its frustrating to learn that the composite sketch was not the correct POI, but all along LE has been asking the public, particularly those on social media, to stop making side by side photo comparisons and instead focus on the profile (not that I think an official one has been released). Moving forward I hope that is what people will focus on, especially knowing that the new composite sketch may not be 100% accurate, even if it truely depicts BG. Rather than a tip about a guy who resembles the composite, they are looking for tips about causasisan males in (or tied to) the community of Delphi that:
-Were unaccounted for on the afternoon of Feb. 13, 2017. (Can you think of someone who was late for work or missed an appointment?)
-Were familiar with the trail system and Monon High Bridge area. (Maybe a regular hiker, hunter, fisherman, nature enthusiast, bird watcher, geocacher etc...)
-Possibly changed their appearance shortly after the murder. (Did your son/husband/bf/neighbor suddenly cut his hair, gain/lose weight, grow a mustache?)
-Possibly changed their behaviour or routines. (Do you know someone who suddenly increased their use of drugs/alcohol or started having anxiety?)
-Might have shown an obsessive interest in the case. (Do you know someone who inserted themselves into the search or pressers or media?)
-Disposed of (or 'lost') clothing, shoes, and/or a bag around the time of the murders?
-Suddenly left town or moved away in February 2017?
So, do we still think reddish brown hair and NOT blue eyes? Is that still part of the new sketch BG's description?
I am only on page 17 of this thread so forgive me if this has been posted. I'll delete if it has, once I catch up.
New MSM article states that the two sketches are NOT of the same person!!!
Delphi Homicide task force clarifies their reason for issuing a new sketch in murder case
I don't know if this idea has been discussed or not. I have tried, but just can't keep up with the threads. My belief is that they got Parabon involved to analyze the DNA and come up with characteristics and a likeness. IMO They freaked out when that likeness matched this old sketch buried in their file along with the stuff about the car which probably came back to an owner with some connection to some guy that also looked like the new old sketch and the likeness. IMO, then, they decided to go genealogy, tied the guy to the general area, and are waiting to further narrow it down; within weeks. Then they gave one last chance at redemption to see what they could force out and are waiting to see whose behavior changes. This all just IN MY OPINION ONLY.
Yes, I think it's likely that he had more than one weapon.Looks to me like something very consistent w/the shape of a handgun in his right pocket (with grip end shoved in first) in the first one his right hand seems to be just above his waistband clutching the top of some long, straight thing shoved into the right leg of his jeans. I don’t think it’s a leg brace — I think it’s something that would come in handy if you wanted to beat someone to a pulp.
Post #9 of this thread, which will hopefully be moved to the next thread as well.Is there a transcript of the news conference anywhere?
Is there a transcript of the news conference anywhere?
MsBetsy, do you think it’s possible that they identified him using means that maybe wouldn’t be admissible, or would be considered ill-gotten legally? Sort of a “fruit of the poisonous tree” situation? Now they need verifiable tips and other evidence to lead them to what they already know? It just seems that they are so specific about what makes a good tip, and that they don’t need new investigative tips. They need that face, that car, that driver.... Just a thought.I don't think they knew for sure until recently. They can't just go pick him up until they have enough evidence to ensure a conviction.
Knowing who he is is only half the battle. They need the evidence to convict. I think that's what they are waiting for. Hopefully it won't be long.
By now the killer knows that it is only a matter of time before they come for him. Jmo
Thank you hokeechic and welcome!I am only on page 17 of this thread so forgive me if this has been posted. I'll delete if it has, once I catch up.
New MSM article states that the two sketches are NOT of the same person!!!
Delphi Homicide task force clarifies their reason for issuing a new sketch in murder case
When this press conference was announced, that was my hope.I don't know if this idea has been discussed or not. I have tried, but just can't keep up with the threads. My belief is that they got Parabon involved to analyze the DNA and come up with characteristics and a likeness. IMO They freaked out when that likeness matched this old sketch buried in their file along with the stuff about the car which probably came back to an owner with some connection to some guy that also looked like the new old sketch and the likeness. IMO, then, they decided to go genealogy, tied the guy to the general area, and are waiting to further narrow it down; within weeks. Then they gave one last chance at redemption to see what they could force out and are waiting to see whose behavior changes. This all just IN MY OPINION ONLY.
I think it's more likely a weapon.Warning graphic picture in link
I believe the man on the bridge may have one of these under his pants on his right leg. I've sent this to the tip line yesterday. See picture #2 from the link.
"Condom catheters, Uridomes, Texas catheters or External catheters. They can be connected to a drainage bag or alternatively a catheter valve if your leakage is very light."
Sheaths
What do you guys think?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.