IllinoisMissing
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Messages
- 812
- Reaction score
- 86
Scroll and roll...scroll and roll.
My new mantra here.
Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk
My new mantra here.
Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk
Yet they removed a pair of boots...thay would have NOTHiNGto do with a binb threat.
There was another bomb threat there about six months ago. I would guarantee the FBI and a helicopter were not called in for the previous one. On one hand, maybe they went because they were "available." On the other hand, they wouldn't take time/resources from a brutal (IMO) double homicide to check out a bomb threat!
I agree. One other thing that struck me when listening to the audio....He is very soft spoken (like an accountant, banker or teacher, IMHO). Any teacher in any school in the area would have been off that day as well. They would have recognized any teacher from their school but perhaps not other schools in the area?
So today we're saying this man was likely a foster child in Delphi and drove an RV ? What evidence do we have thus far that would lead us to believe that either of those theories are at all plausible? I could say that I think he drove a pink car and has a cat but without a reason to really believe that, I'd just be pulling random stuff out of the air
Bikers do ragTo me, this pic makes it more like the bandana below.
![]()
http://www.kandgcycles.com/zan-head...JdBhgHTR73tBSOOONdsL4Avm8j_iPx-OC0aAr1B8P8HAQ
I haven't been able to keep up on the posts (is that even possible at this point?)
I don't have a link right now, but there was a woman who said she'd been on the bridge that day. If I'm remembering correctly, she said it was near or not long after the time Libby posted the last pic of Abby. She also said she'd only seen a guy & a couple there and that she had walked the bridge & back, but didn't notice anything unusual. There was no mention if any of the people she saw looked anything like BG.
Take it easy. Have some coffee.![]()
Look at the header of this website.
It's WebSLEUTHS.
I think some people forget that.
No one on this website is going to find the killer...........of that I am sure.
Trust me BG is on this board electeonically revisting the crime.
what evidence supports this claim?
O/T a little I haven't dug around on websleuths much as I've been on this thread 99% of the time.
People keep saying this thread is moving fast/hard to keep up with
Is this the norm with high profile cases or does this case have a lot more participation from members/new members then similar cases of the past?
Go back and read the entire thread. Pay attention to join dates.
While it may not be fair to misquote someone, how come it's fair to pull random theories out of air without one piece of evidence to support them? How does that help find the killer? I could say he's a circus clown who likes nachos on Tuesday but I have no evidence that supports that theory so it's just absolutely a disservice to this case. I understand people want to help but shouldn't our theories be supported by some fact here? How is it at all helpful to just throw random theories out without any way to support them?
O/T a little I haven't dug around on websleuths much as I've been on this thread 99% of the time.
People keep saying this thread is moving fast/hard to keep up with
Is this the norm with high profile cases or does this case have a lot more participation from members/new members then similar cases of the past?
There are GAME THREADS?!?!?
O/T a little I haven't dug around on websleuths much as I've been on this thread 99% of the time.
People keep saying this thread is moving fast/hard to keep up with
Is this the norm with high profile cases or does this case have a lot more participation from members/new members then similar cases of the past?
O/T a little I haven't dug around on websleuths much as I've been on this thread 99% of the time.
People keep saying this thread is moving fast/hard to keep up with
Is this the norm with high profile cases or does this case have a lot more participation from members/new members then similar cases of the past?
O/T a little I haven't dug around on websleuths much as I've been on this thread 99% of the time.
People keep saying this thread is moving fast/hard to keep up with
Is this the norm with high profile cases or does this case have a lot more participation from members/new members then similar cases of the past?