If anyone needs a break from the case (don't we all, at some point?), searching autocorrect bloopers can give you some hearty laughs.
I'm STILL getting grin-mileage from Giacalone AND Jackalone (but that's just me!)

NOW back to the case...
If anyone needs a break from the case (don't we all, at some point?), searching autocorrect bloopers can give you some hearty laughs.
Yeah...that one is weird!This case is moving so fast here I've not been able to keep up. (Not that it is any faster than some others, it's more due to what is going on with me outside Websleuths - Life Happens.)
I've listened to the audio several times on more than media source and I can't really pick out an accent. The voice just seems neutral to me. LE indicated that they have more and this is all they are giving the public because they believe this is enough.
[video=youtube;p4X07K2Fx5Q]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4X07K2Fx5Q[/video]
I don't know if I would recognize that voice without more, but maybe with the photos and the audio someone in that area can recognize it. With over thousands of tips called, maybe LE has it already but just hasn't been able to follow up.
I wonder why Libby got a video of this guy? (Or were others captured on video as well, but then why would LE focus on this one?) I'm wondering if they encountered him going the other way toward the parking lot as they were going out. They said 'hi' and got a strange response or maybe just his demeanor in general. Then they encountered him again as they turned around to go back or they later noticed he was behind them following? I don't see this being something planned. I'm wondering if this guy had something going on in his life - break up with a girl friend, family issue, work issue - and he took offense to some otherwise innocent remark or giggling. Such a act may have been between the girls and nothing to do with him. And he snapped. I believe when they find this guy their going to find he has had domestic issues in the past.
Just a thought. After the Sherri Papini case I really saw that things can be way off from what seem in the beginning.
I am with you.
I think he left the bodies so that they would be found out in the open. He was going for shock value to the people who found them and he was denigrating his victims all the more by leaving them exposed.
(By "exposed" I mean out in the open, not buried or hidden. We don't know what if any clothing they were wearing.)
I also think he is watching the coverage, and the WHOLE PROCESS from planning, to luring, to killing, to watching it all unfold is what this perp is about. It's not just the short amount of time harming the girls at motivates him and satisfies him - it's all of it.
jmopinion at the moment
They can get the GIRLS' DNA, but unlikely a perp's.as for the girls Elizabeth and Lyric, from my understanding, DNA can be still taken from bones, teeth root etc. it's a rather long list
Location of bodies is incorrect. -Nin
If it's RL. He's listed as "former member"
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Someone here told him his posts were creepy - maybe he got insulted...
he was fairly (and unnecessarilly) graphic...
I'm STILL getting grin-mileage from Giacalone AND Jackalone (but that's just me!)
NOW back to the case...
Someone here told him his posts were creepy - maybe he got insulted...
he was fairly (and unnecessarilly) graphic...
He looks like he rides a motorcycle.
Jmo
I have to agree. You would think with all the technology/internet/SM we have now that people would be much more informed, but it seems to be just the opposite. Or maybe there has been such an increase in the evil and crimes committed we've just become desensitized. Sad world we live in!
It's very possible I may have mixed this up with another case, but I swear on all that is holy I read in an article that they were found without their pants on. Please take that as my crazy mind for now, because I have gone over every article I had saved and can not find that statement again. It may have been redacted quickly or it may have been me mixing cases. I follow so many and it's happened to me before. Does anyone else recall reading that very early on in this case? I thought maybe someone else had caught that and then it was gone and was thinking like I am, maybe I am crazy and mixing cases...??? I remember the statement being said along with how the girls were found they were lead to believe it was a homicide. Ugh, for the life of me it's driving me crazy. I honestly hope that isn't the case. Why else would their pants be off unless some final form of humiliation? Or I suppose it's possible he made them take them off in the hopes of them not running away because they had no pants on? Just another control technique? I don't want to focus too much on this because I can't back up what I swear I had read in the beginning of all of this. I just wanted to know if anyone else had seen that little blurb before it was disappeared?
I see your point. I've commented before that I cringed when LE spoke at the press conference about calling in any tip and not overthinking it's validity (not the exact words). They thanked the media and asked for the public's help. Initially it seemed more locally focused but now that it has expanded across the nation and they have not clarified what constitutes a tip, I'm not surprised in the response. I also understand not wanting to deter anyone because that just might be the one they are looking for.Speaking of Missy Bevers, I am wondering how long before LE has to issue a public plea for people to stop reporting everyone and his dog (or mannequin) as a suspect. We have already seen the harassment of the people at the first warrant. Now, we have people encouraging others to report a random dude from the Internet who simply may have decided that the site wasn't for him. This is what I meant about Internet "sleuths" actually getting in the way of LE and destroying the lives of innocent people. Everyone here better hope no one ever takes a shine to them as a suspect...
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
I'm not saying you are right or wrong... Just saying a number of folks here would be under suspicion for various crimes based on join date. Google Abby and Libby's name and WS pops up. People join. It might be that simple.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Would BG wear a jacket over a jacket? that just doesn't make sense to me. I see a sweatshirt hoodie under a jacket tho.No this is not a hoodie in this mugshot its a jacket similar if not a Carhartt
work jacket. Many farmers, hunters, and just plain ole regular people wear them. I used to wear one at my last job, it was a knock
off but it was provided for me. here is a pic.....
![]()
Or maybe it is some evil weirdo who wants people to think it is him.
SBM-
I have never seen any such statement but I didn't start watching news carefully until this case was about a week old, FWIW.