D
Deleted member 278
Guest
I'm sure Slocum has lots of irons in the fire.I'd settle for one person in jail. That would end the rumors.Sgt. Slocum should be working on the next release of information to the public regarding suspect.
I'm sure Slocum has lots of irons in the fire.I'd settle for one person in jail. That would end the rumors.Sgt. Slocum should be working on the next release of information to the public regarding suspect.
Personally, I think this crime was so horrific that they wanted him identified immediately. I think the 6,000 billboards also speaks to that. MY OPINION ONLY
I'm catching what your throwing Nonna. I have always maintained IMO, that these poor babies were victims of happenstance. Could just as well have been a lone woman walker or jogger. JMO. IMO.For those of us searching for possible reasons for the double murders of Libby and Abby, the following murder that was solved earlier in February in Queens, NY, of Karina Vetrano brings out an interesting theory. She was out jogging on Aug 2, 2016 when she disappeared. Her body was discovered a few hours later.
Basically, the accused murderer 20 yr old Chanel Lewis, who was arrested for the murder, says he just snapped, saw her and starting beating her.
http://nypost.com/2017/02/06/jogger-murder-suspect-i-strangled-her-because-i-was-angry/
This is a very simple solution to a violent crime. No rhyme or reason. Lewis was angry, issues at home, he saw her and just went crazy. She was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Maybe something as simple as this could be the scenario for Libby and Abby's deaths. I'm not saying it was, just throwing this out there for thought. MOO
You know I was thinking the other day about somebody identifying BG off of his voice, Have you ever listened to the difference btwn someones voice in person and on a recording. I know I probably couldn't identify my wifes voice on a recording unless I knew it was her ahead of time. I'm not sure I have ever heard her voice recorded before. Just one of those things that I think would be hard to distinguish especially with only three words to do so from. just my 2 cents
Maybe these will provide the best version of the photos.Been lurking for a while, absorbing info.
Does anyone know if the original Snapchat images are archived somewhere?
There are many different versions (file format, size etc) from news articles, each having different compression artifacts that can be mis-interpereted.
I was hoping to analyze the closest thing to the original Snapchat images as possible. I have seen two versions of Liberty on the bridge photo that seem to be screenshotted by two different Snapchat users.
Thanks.
Sure, most images are 'compressed' somehow to make the file size smaller (better for transmitting over the internet and storing on a memory card). The compression process throws away some of the originally captured image information to make the file size smaller, but tries to do it in a way that minimizes the visual difference from the original.Hi, welcome,
I'm really interested in what you are saying because I keep thinking I'm going mad with what I'm seeing in some images.
Can you please explain more on "compression artefacts" in laymans terms to a complete novice.
Thank you
Sure, most images are 'compressed' somehow to make the file size smaller (better for transmitting over the internet and storing on a memory card). The compression process throws away some of the originally captured image information to make the file size smaller, but tries to do it in a way that minimizes the visual difference from the original.
Compression artifacts are un-intended fine details in the image that are not real, but simply due to the compression process approximating the original. Hope that makes sense.
I have found about 3 versions of the image of Liberty on the bridge: one version that looks like there *may* be vehicle in the trees on the left hand side and two versions where I don't see that at all.
It's my understanding that this hillside is steep and going down right there could involve some sliding and require digging in. I don't think this is a commonly used path to go from the south end of the bridge to the road. Also since this is behind the CS tape I wonder if LE didn't see something and scoop dirt and leaves up to analyze. Maybe someone who has used the bridge can tell us if this is a common path.
I know, that's why is say hindsight. He could have been cocky, showed up to the vigil either for appearance sake, or for the thrill of it. Undercover agents equipped with the photo could have identified him and started surveillance.Personally, I think this crime was so horrific that they wanted him identified immediately. I think the 6,000 billboards also speaks to that. MY OPINION ONLY
I agree. But let's say your already thinking of someone based upon the PHOTO released, and then the voice was released and it cements it for you. Could have been helpful that way.You know I was thinking the other day about somebody identifying BG off of his voice, Have you ever listened to the difference btwn someones voice in person and on a recording. I know I probably couldn't identify my wifes voice on a recording unless I knew it was her ahead of time. I'm not sure I have ever heard her voice recorded before. Just one of those things that I think would be hard to distinguish especially with only three words to do so from. just my 2 cents