- Joined
- Sep 25, 2015
- Messages
- 1,215
- Reaction score
- 9,090
It's a mystery!
Remember, LE said that some alibis were turning out to be less than truthful. A month ago, suscipions might not have run in the direction they are now.
It's a mystery!
And can't they get it from a discarded coffee cup or water bottle, etc.?
jmo
If two people are found dead on your property, why wouldn't you VOLUNTARILY give your DNA to LE just to clear your name? Just seems like common sense IMO
That's what I thought too. In his pronunciation, he turned "hill" up in a way that seemed unnatural or forced.IMO. Man I really thought so too. Seemed like he tried to say hill different, in a higher tone. This is crazy. Confused if that's the case.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And can't they get it from a discarded coffee cup or water bottle, etc.?
jmo
If two people are found dead on your property, why wouldn't you VOLUNTARILY give your DNA to LE just to clear your name? Just seems like common sense IMO
I agree, something's going on. But this case has been so ALL over the place with LE at first acting so weird and tight lipped like they really had a good handle on who did this and it was only a matter of time (and parents should "know what their kids are doing). Then they went to the nationwide billboard blitz and that huge reward started building. Now they are serving a search warrant mere steps away from where the bodies were found.
Does LE really know what they're doing here?? The billboards are REALLY throwing me off.
Was it you that said you saw a drone near the PO house?Lots of speculation going on here. Interesting theories.
On a slightly different note, my daughter is not happy, at all. If you recall, I dragged her with me a week after the murders, to see the bridge and take photos.
After we visited the bridge, we went down the road to the cemetery. As we pulled up, there was a white vehicle coming toward us that slowed and stopped maybe a hundred yards away.
As we walked around the cemetery my daughter was totally freaked about the vehicle and insisted we leave. As we came out, I turned to photograph RL's property and the truck moved forward directly across from us. My daughter literally ran for our car. I insisted it was LE or a neighbor checking on us.
My daughter looked at RLs truck today and told me she hates me (she doesn't). She insists that's the truck that stopped.
Off topic, I guess. I wish I would have photographed it but my daughter was yelling, "Mom, stop! You're going to get us killed!"
Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk
AFAIK that DNA would never be admissible because of handling problems, contamination, chain of custody, etc.
If I'm wrong someone have an actual reference to the legality?
AFAIK that DNA would never be admissible because of handling problems, contamination, chain of custody, etc.
If I'm wrong someone have an actual reference to the legality?
I saw one serial killer on ID channel get caught from DNA on his soda can/cup, as LE watched for it when he tossed it. I think I have heard of other cases.
That's what I thought too. In his pronunciation, he turned "hill" up in a way that seemed unnatural or forced.
____________
The above is just my opinion.
From what I've seen, this went into effect 6/2016. Iirc, his felony charge was in 2014. I do wonder if his dna was already on file or if he voluntarily gave it. Or, maybe they've matched fingerprints, which likely would have been on file from his prior arrests.I am under the impression that his DNA is on file since he has a conviction for a class D Felony. Unless it's automatic for violent offenders only?
I am under the impression that his DNA is on file since he has a conviction for a class D Felony. Unless it's automatic for violent offenders only?
Some folks still don't trust DNA or how it works. Maybe he is worried they might have found his near the crime scene since he lives there? Anyway...maybe he did give a sample. If he did, it did not match Imo.
He also could have lied about his alibi early on because while not involved in the murders he was doing other nefarious activity or something that violated probation and knew if he told the truth he would go to jail. Meaning if the alibi isn't true it does not automatically mean he had anything to do with what happened
If two people are found dead on your property, why wouldn't you VOLUNTARILY give your DNA to LE just to clear your name? Just seems like common sense IMO