Wouldn't change my mind because I don't believe BG to be a day over 30.
I'm not sure he isn't over 30, but he's not 77. I'm thinking 40s maybe, but he could be younger. JMO
Wouldn't change my mind because I don't believe BG to be a day over 30.
Capable of immobilizing a victim.Capable of what precisely?
I guess that's what I am wondering, although I agree he looks younger, I am not sure why I think that. What specifically makes him look younger?I'm not sure he isn't over 30, but he's not 77. I'm thinking 40s maybe, but he could be younger. JMO
Today I am taking scholarship applications around to the high schools in my area. While doing it I will be thinking of Abby and Liberty who will never get to go to college. I hope when I come home some how there will be a break in this case. I will be speaking with guidance counselors today and I am going to mention the girls and the safety program I talked about earlier.
Wish me luck...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
liltexans, being our anointed news scoops keeper, perhaps you can answer this question. TIA
Back around Feb 16, in RLs interview with the male reporter, who was wearing the long black wool coat, doesn't RL state, at the beginning of the interview, that
He called the media? Did RL state further: "That is why I called .... I wanted to show you that it is impossible..."
If RL is involved and he invited the media onto his property, why would he do that? He invited the media to film his land and the exact CS location to show the world that it is impossible ....?
liltexans, being our anointed news scoops keeper, perhaps you can answer this question. TIA
Back around Feb 16, in RLs interview with the male reporter, who was wearing the long black wool coat, doesn't RL state, at the beginning of the interview, that
He called the media? Did RL state further: "That is why I called .... I wanted to show you that it is impossible..."
If RL is involved and he invited the media onto his property, why would he do that? He invited the media to film his land and the exact CS location to show the world that it is impossible ....?
We know so very little. LE has said BG participated in the murders, but LE has not said he acted alone, in fact they have publicly stated that LE has definitely not ruled out there being more than one murderer. It is my opinion that RL is not the guy on the bridge.. but to me the audio "down the hill" does sound like RL...MOO
JMO....he's late 40's, between 5'10" and 5'11" about 210 to 220 pounds.I'm not sure he isn't over 30, but he's not 77. I'm thinking 40s maybe, but he could be younger. JMO
His posture I think.I guess that's what I am wondering, although I agree he looks younger, I am not sure why I think that. What specifically makes him look younger?
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
I agree. JMO, I also think RL is so talkative is due to his age and for once he probably felt he would not be the target from LE in this incident and he felt he had nothing to hide even though his alibi was not truthful. MOO
Sorry...auto-correct changed that and I do not know how to Edit.I want to make sure that it is clear that I did not say TO IS the perp...I stated IF RL is the perp.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
Personally the interviews are a red flag for me. But as a puzzle, it just doesn't fit right. If we didn't have that picture I would swear we had our suspect in RL. If not for those images. Circles.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
I guess that's what I am wondering, although I agree he looks younger, I am not sure why I think that. What specifically makes him look younger?
Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
BBM - I agree, absolutely, I have experienced it with people myself and as much as I know this I still can't see it in this case with him.
moo
As per page one on this thread we may sleuth RL within a certain scope. Not his family.After reading several posts I am confused.
Is this rule no longer in effect??
R.L HAS NOT BEEN NAMED A PERSON OF INTEREST. Please do not accuse him of the crime.
No not at all. I simply meant DNA throughout the land could be explained away from him owning the land and having full access to it, unlike any other individuals. I am not making any reference to anything that may have been found on the bodies.Yes, that would be, but the poster seems to be indicating that any DNA found on the girls could be explained away, which is why I was asking if that means she doesn't think the girls were assaulted or had defensive wounds.
IMO I just can't agree. If the alibi you produce for a double homicide of 2 girls found on your property isn't truthful then you do have something to hide..