- Joined
- Feb 25, 2017
- Messages
- 7,073
- Reaction score
- 33,747
I searched for a thread for the Flora, In arson/murders case and didn't find one.
Am I search impaired or wasn't one ever started?
Am I search impaired or wasn't one ever started?
RSBMHere is a new interview from LE saying DN really doesn't show anything that would lead the LE to consider him a suspect. I hope they get him for his other offenses. Anyway here is an interview someone shared with me. I think it can be posted since it's a direct Sheriff interview. If not please delete.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l9OyqFUUmNw
RSBM
Sadly, I don’t think LE is close to solving these murders.
Yes, how he says it really is key. ThanksRSBM
Its not only what the sheriff says but how he says it. Giving DN the third-degree has turned up nothing substantive related to the Delphi case. And I noticed the sheriff said nothing to indicate DN had not talked with investigators during the 4 or 5 days they spent in CO. Had DN refused, the sheriff certainly wouldve hinted at frustration with getting info from DN. (I mean, DN was the number one person they needed to talk to in CO; and the investigators, upon their return, said they had spoken to the people they needed to speak to.) Sadly, I dont think LE is close to solving these murders.
Current docket:
![]()
I may be naive, but that appears to be a pretty heavy schedule of appearances for a trespassing charge. :thinking:
I may be naive, but that appears to be a pretty heavy schedule of appearances for a trespassing charge. :thinking:
I guess my post was deleted for some reason? I can't see it maybe it's my iPad? It's an honest question, what next? I'm just asking a similar question like shire asking ppl who thought it was RL what now? For the record I was on the fence with that guy too.
We don't know he lacks an alibi and imo his background is disgusting true, murderous I wouldn't say that, yet.
Here is a new interview from LE saying DN really doesn't show anything that would lead the LE to consider him a suspect. I hope they get him for his other offenses. Anyway here is an interview someone shared with me. I think it can be posted since it's a direct Sheriff interview. If not please delete.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l9OyqFUUmNw
ETA: Thanks btw, there are but ppl moved on from them too, RL, for example. I just think it will go cold and that really is not good. Is there anything else too look at not being talked about at this moment?
I keep looking at the mug shot of DN and the artist rendition of BG. While there are certainly similarities I think the one thing that keeps throwing me is the difference it makes me feel. BG artist rendition shows more of an arrogance imo while DN mug shots shows more of a goofiness imo. Hard as I try they just give me completely different vibes.
I guess my post was deleted for some reason? I can't see it maybe it's my iPad? It's an honest question, what next? I'm just asking a similar question like shire asking ppl who thought it was RL what now? For the record I was on the fence with that guy too.
We don't know he lacks an alibi and imo his background is disgusting true, murderous I wouldn't say that, yet.
Here is a new interview from LE saying DN really doesn't show anything that would lead the LE to consider him a suspect. I hope they get him for his other offenses. Anyway here is an interview someone shared with me. I think it can be posted since it's a direct Sheriff interview. If not please delete.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l9OyqFUUmNw
ETA: Thanks btw, there are but ppl moved on from them too, RL, for example. I just think it will go cold and that really is not good. Is there anything else too look at not being talked about at this moment?
Thanks, I saw the interview earlier today. I get where you're coming from, but I just want to add a different perspective on what Sheriff Leazenby may be meaning.
I could be wrong, but I think he's learned his lesson from how unclear he was on the DNA vs no DNA, early in the investigation. That created so many further questions and clarifications for LE to deal with.
I don't believe he was used to the media exposure at that time. How could he have been? Nothing like this had ever happened there.
I believe he's been properly schooled now on how to sidestep all media questions adroitly. He has learned to keep the cards close to the vest, and not get boxed in.
What is more notable to me at this point is the fact that they have not cleared DN.
I can more easily understand LE wanting to get all their legal ducks in a row before moving him up the list, far better than I can them NOT clearing him.
I know LE has said they have others too they haven't cleared. But DN seems to be the main one on the media's radar anyway.
So why not? What is it about this case that keeps them from being unable to clear him? What is the sticking point?
I would think LE would want to publicly clear him as soon as possible, if only because it would seem to make their lives easier. (Media hype, etc.)
You could be right about this. I'm not really disagreeing with you. In fact, some days I lean far more toward your view.
I want to say too, I do appreciate your posts. No matter which direction I'm leaning, I know your posts are going to be low-key and factual.
Traits I admire.
I hope you keep posting...
JMO
The LE absolutely needs to give a proper update on this case, you are 100% correct, imo. Thanks for posting at times I thought I was in the upside down.I agree with you.
We don't know that DN doesn't have an alibi. Because of the lack of updates, we honestly don't know much about what's going on at all, which is causing people to speculate and to then turn those speculations into fact.
I don't know how DN has been able to remain on the streets. At the very least, I think he needs some help from a mental health professional. He appears to come with a whole host of issues, ranging from inappropriate sexual behavior to menacing and threatening.
I still haven't seen a single thing that ties him to Delphi, however, or the murders.
Thanks, you know in this case they are not publicly clearing anyone. It's truly frustrating and not fair to the wrongly accused. The case has been beyond strange.
The LE absolutely needs to give a proper update on this case, you are 100% correct, imo. Thanks for posting at times I thought I was in the upside down.
I get a television channel called Escape and a few days ago there was a show on there called Unsolved Mysteries...they were talking about how the sketch of a POI is only as good as the sketch artist..because it is the way you go about questioning the witness that achieves the best results...NOT the way standard police department sketch artists do it. This lady in Arizona (I believe) whose name is Jean Boylin who works with the police as a sketch artist has been able to get remarkable results with her sketches. It showed some of her sketches with the photo of the POI and it is SHOCKING how close/almost exact her sketches are!!! She said that that is why it is so difficult often times to find the POI...a poor sketch. Perhaps that is what has happened here? I think most of us agree that the sketch and photo of the face look different. I hope that the police department/FBI know about this lady. You never know..it just might change this case.
KN gives interview to Greeno.... http://youtube.com/watch?v=XrB3vjyxFsw
*This is a great interview.Answers alot of questions being asked here.
Car,rifle,hatchet,which bridge he was living under...etc..etc
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.