IN - Abigail Williams, 13, & Liberty German, 14, Delphi, 13 Feb 2017 #73

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #781
Just wanted to say thanks for writing such an informative post in response to me.

I know we all appreciate it when posters respond in a polite manner that adds to the discussion. I stand corrected.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You made a statement as fact and I asked for your source.

There is nothing in TOS against asking someone to cite a source. In fact it is required by TOS.

I have been here since day one posting on this thread and know every inch of this case as many here do.

The last few days have been spent picking apart DN in an effort to make him BG. This aside from the fact Sheriff Leazenby stated they have nothing to connect him to this case.

This site used to be one that a person had to provide a MSM link to back up a statement. Or if someone was only providing an opinion to state that as well.
 
  • #782
It’s another oddity, and maybe why she put herself out there with the YouTube guys and the interview with the MSM. She’s playing the cards about her kids close to the vest.

There def is info the public isn’t privy, but the length of time since the media reported him as a POI until today seems long to me without any kind of filing in IN.

IMO.

Jabarn if you have not heard the most recent interview with Sheriff Leazenby, I will be happy to link here for you.
 
  • #783
Jabarn if you have not heard the most recent interview with Sheriff Leazenby, I will be happy to link here for you.

Please, bird of paradise. I didn’t see it, I don’t think.
 
  • #784
Please, bird of paradise. I didn’t see it, I don’t think.

For the record I have personally checked with and received confirmation from the Carroll County Sheriff's Department that this is in fact Tobe Leazenby's voice we are hearing. I will provide that information to a moderator if asked to do so.



[video=youtube;l9OyqFUUmNw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9OyqFUUmNw[/video]
 
  • #785
Just wanted to say thanks for writing such an informative post in response to me.

I know we all appreciate it when posters respond in a polite manner that adds to the discussion. I stand corrected.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


  1. The Sex Offender Management Board is charged with evaluating, adopting guidelines, andmaking recommendations to the legislature about the residency location of sex offenders in thecommunity, particularly in relation to schools and child care facilities (Section 16-11.7-103 (4)(j),C.R.S.). The board sets guidelines for community supervision of sex offenders. The guidelinesprohibit sex offenders from being near schools, parks, or other places frequented by children unlessa supervising officer, in consultation with a supervising team, approves the visit in advance. Theguidelines also prohibit contact with children without prior approval. However, the guidelines donot specify a distance that sex offenders must stay away from schools, parks, or other areasfrequented by children. A sex offender's parole or probation officer uses the guidelines to approvethe location of the sex offender's residence.





Per Colorado rules regarding registered sex offenders, DN would not be allowed near schools, parks or playgrounds without supervision, thank God.
 
  • #786
She gives an odd answer in the youtube video when they're talking about DN's alibi for 2/13. About the 19:18 mark.

Interviewer: "Where does he claim he was that day?"
KN: "I don't know I haven't spoken to him. Since he was arrested in September, I believe what, that was the 25th I think? But I'm not 100%. But on the 25th since he was arrested, I have not seen that man since that day. I have not talked to him, seen him, I haven't written to him. The only reason I've seen him (inaudible, sounds like 'in court').
Interviewer: "Because of the no contact order."
KN: "In court, we're not allowed to speak to each other. "
(Conversation then turns to ISP contacting her.)

She doesn't answer the question about where DN told her he was on 2/13. She goes straight into saying she doesn't know because she hasn't spoken to him since his arrest in September. What kind of answer is that? She skirted right around that question IMO. This is an example of why I have problems with her credibility. MOO
 
  • #787
If you Google Daniel Nations and go to images there is a photo of DN with his daughter in pink. He is right behind her. The liner of the hood of his jacket appears to me to be blue. So I presume worn inside out the whole thing would appear to be blue. MOO
Does anyone else see this?

I looked at the photo that you mentioned. I think that his jacket looks dark blue. And I can’t see the front of it, so it could have snaps and be reversible. In this photo AND the photo of BG, I notice something on the lower left sleeve, His Left. Like a mark or label or something. Same location on both photos. It’s likely pixelation but since it jumped out at me I thought I would mention it.
 
  • #788
Jabarn if you have not heard the most recent interview with Sheriff Leazenby, I will be happy to link here for you.

I would prefer you give me the rundown. Did the Sheriff say they have nothing to link DN to the Delphi murders?
 
  • #789
I would prefer you give me the rundown. Did the Sheriff say they have nothing to link DN to the Delphi murders?

I posted this a couple of days ago. This is the part where he speaks directly about DN

"I don't think there's been an exact determination with his involvement at this stage, at his stage nothing has really come forward to lead us to believe he is involved but we don't have anything concrete."
 
  • #790
I posted this a couple of days ago. This is the part where he speaks directly about DN

"I don't think there's been an exact determination with his involvement at this stage, at his stage nothing has really come forward to lead us to believe he is involved but we don't have anything concrete."
That's not really an answer at all.LE is very frustrating.
 
  • #791
For the record I have personally checked with and received confirmation from the Carroll County Sheriff's Department that this is in fact Tobe Leazenby's voice we are hearing. I will provide that information to a moderator if asked to do so.



[video=youtube;l9OyqFUUmNw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9OyqFUUmNw[/video]

Ok- I had started to watch this before, but didn’t watch it to completion. The guy in the bedroom interviewing the top detective in Delphi didn’t seem right to me, at the time. FWIW, I also couldn’t watch until completion the YouTube videos from the Greeno & Stroup team all the way to completion either, except for the short one posted recently, which I didn’t trust completely for accuracy.

Who knows? We live in a new time of technology and who I am to judge?

I just did watch all the link of the YouTube interview with Leazenby you shared. I guess my take away is Leazenby suggests too much speculation muddies the water for investigators. The FBI is handling the Delphi tip line (844-459-5786).
 
  • #792
That's not really an answer at all.LE is very frustrating.

That’s the same thing I was trying to say yesterday. The quote from Sheriff Leazenby posted by BoP which you replied to leaves us back where we started. Basically IN LE cannot rule him in or out, so DN is still a POI and not a suspect.

Frustrating doesn’t even begin to describe it! I feel so bad for the families and friends of these girls.
 
  • #793
Ok- I had started to watch this before, but didn’t watch it to completion. The guy in the bedroom interviewing the top detective in Delphi didn’t seem right to me, at the time. FWIW, I also couldn’t watch until completion the YouTube videos from the Greeno & Stroup team all the way to completion either, except for the short one posted recently, which I didn’t trust completely for accuracy.

Who knows? We live in a new time of technology and who I am to judge?

I just did watch all the link of the YouTube interview with Leazenby you shared. I guess my take away is Leazenby suggests too much speculation muddies the water for investigators. The FBI is handling the Delphi tip line (844-459-5786).

Because I shared your skepticism and there was no information on the "About" page for the interviewer I took it upon myself to gain confirmation it really is Sheriff Leazenby as I stated.

I also knew that people will interpret the interview differently because people hear things differently.

My impression from him saying "at this stage nothing has come forward to lead us to believe he is involved..." means there is no immediate evidence in their posession. But I know others will take it as he is not saying anything one way or the other. I agree with everyone who says LE's words are often hard to interpret.
 
  • #794
Because I shared your skepticism and there was no information on the "About" page for the interviewer I took it upon myself to gain confirmation it really is Sheriff Leazenby as I stated.

I also knew that people will interpret the interview differently because people hear things differently.

My impression from him saying "at this stage nothing has come forward to lead us to believe he is involved..." means there is no immediate evidence in their posession. But I know others will take it as he is not saying anything one way or the other. I agree with everyone who says LE's words are often hard to interpret.

No worries at all, and thanks for sharing the link to this interview. It is all so strange. I am way too cautious to ever go out and try to get an interview with a major player in a murder case and then post it on YouTube, but it seems there are plenty who go right out there and do it. It does make it confusing for everyone.
 
  • #795
  • #796
Because I shared your skepticism and there was no information on the "About" page for the interviewer I took it upon myself to gain confirmation it really is Sheriff Leazenby as I stated.

I also knew that people will interpret the interview differently because people hear things differently.

My impression from him saying "at this stage nothing has come forward to lead us to believe he is involved..." means there is no immediate evidence in their posession. But I know others will take it as he is not saying anything one way or the other. I agree with everyone who says LE's words are often hard to interpret.

As much as I want DN to be our guy (because I want to believe the bad guy has been caught) this one statement from the detective is either: a blatant lie, or DN is simply not the guy, or Indiana LE have ZERO evidence to work with. None of those scenarios are particularly appealing to me.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
  • #797
  • #798
I would prefer you give me the rundown. Did the Sheriff say they have nothing to link DN to the Delphi murders?
This is a great interview and commentary if you will from the Sheriff. It's something one should hear, to really get his tone of voice. As another poster stated as soon as this was posted on the threads.


snipped by me

My impression from him saying "at this stage nothing has come forward to lead us to believe he is involved..." means there is no immediate evidence in their posession. But I know others will take it as he is not saying anything one way or the other. I agree with everyone who says LE's words are often hard to interpret.

BBM
I don't know why this has been ignored.
Thanks for your hard work as always.
 
  • #799
It is clear BG has on a big ol jacket, and while he may have a hoodie on beneath it, it’s a big jacket, a coat, in the pic. That white circling thing below his neck in the pics is what is strange.

I am getting frustrated, so will get off here tonight. ❤️

OH~~I was referring to the poster above who thought the jacket {hoodie} in the picture of DN with one of his children was the same as the jacket on BG. There is no way in my mind they are the same. The picture of DN with one of his children is a Purdue hoodie, while BG's is a blue jacket~~Not the same whatsoever, IMHO.
 
  • #800
That’s the same thing I was trying to say yesterday. The quote from Sheriff Leazenby posted by BoP which you replied to leaves us back where we started. Basically IN LE cannot rule him in or out, so DN is still a POI and not a suspect.

Frustrating doesn’t even begin to describe it! I feel so bad for the families and friends of these girls.
The family doesn’t seem to be speaking out about DN so maybe they know more now about whether he was involved. Also AG is saying that the DNA is a match for DN and he swears on his life that a reliable source from LE told him that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
146
Guests online
2,908
Total visitors
3,054

Forum statistics

Threads
632,133
Messages
18,622,583
Members
243,032
Latest member
beccabelle70
Back
Top