- Joined
- Nov 25, 2016
- Messages
- 10,088
- Reaction score
- 35,974
Maybe he had to rehang his cell door?In a jail suit too though?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure about the jail suit but talking about BG mainly. :wink:
:cow:
Maybe he had to rehang his cell door?In a jail suit too though?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I posted the link to the allowed one in the media thread.I recall KN stating that DN threw out some of his clothes because they had holes in some of the items (in CO)...I think I heard this on an MS youtube. I am going back to see if I can figure out if this is what she said.
He wasn't long term homeless and had been evicted mid Jan only. KN said she did his laundry. I think he may have been working that day and got off early, and still had carpentry tools with him. I am doubting a urinary bag but a concealed holster or mahogany or plastic framers square I think could be possible.Thanks for the response. I dont see it being a carpenters square. Maybe if it was in a pouch, but homeless and seemingly without a job it seems weird he'd always have a carpenters square with him. A urinary bag makes more sense.
I recall KN stating that DN threw out some of his clothes because they had holes in some of the items (in CO)...I think I heard this on an MS youtube. I am going back to see if I can figure out if this is what she said.
Yes she did say that as well as saying their stuff was stolen too IIRC.
Has anyone considered a simple question, why would Indiana spend the money to bring DN back to Indiana for a prosecution on failure to register as a sex offender (according to press reporting), if the man had left the state? Not all failures to register get prosecuted, just as not all violations of probation get people put back in jail.
They had to extradite this guy and that costs time and money. What is behind that? My suspicion is they want to keep him close.
https://www.indystar.com/story/news...year-after-slayings-abby-and-libby/326442002/
Has anyone considered a simple question, why would Indiana spend the money to bring DN back to Indiana for a prosecution on failure to register as a sex offender (according to press reporting), if the man had left the state? Not all failures to register get prosecuted, just as not all violations of probation get people put back in jail.
They had to extradite this guy and that costs time and money. What is behind that? My suspicion is they want to keep him close.
https://www.indystar.com/story/news...year-after-slayings-abby-and-libby/326442002/
MOO, I wish LE would come out and announce that no one in the family is involved in this crime. It may be they have said something here and there but I haven't heard it. If they would announce that no one who was there that day and night, participating in the search, had anything to do with this it may produce some tips. I say this because many people believe that family is involved when a crime like this happens. If people in the community were convinced there was no family involvement they may be forced to consider some lingering doubt about someone else and report their suspicions. IMO
I don't think he has been excluded so I agree ATM. I think they are lacking evidence to place any one person on the bridge. They need someone to snitch basically imo.
He wasn't long term homeless and had been evicted mid Jan only. KN said she did his laundry. I think he may have been working that day and got off early, and still had carpentry tools with him. I am doubting a urinary bag but a concealed holster or mahogany or plastic framers square I think could be possible.
:cow:
Has anyone considered a simple question, why would Indiana spend the money to bring DN back to Indiana for a prosecution on failure to register as a sex offender (according to press reporting), if the man had left the state? Not all failures to register get prosecuted, just as not all violations of probation get people put back in jail.
They had to extradite this guy and that costs time and money. What is behind that? My suspicion is they want to keep him close.
https://www.indystar.com/story/news...year-after-slayings-abby-and-libby/326442002/
A prior employer interviewed by MSM stated he worked for a construction company out of Zionsville. I haven't heard he was unemployed at the time, have you?I have not heard he had a job at the time?
Maybe he had to rehang his cell door?
Not sure about the jail suit but talking about BG mainly. :wink:
:cow:
So, a carpenters ruler (in BGs left pocket) while on a hike / hunt, over a high-bridge? I dont know if I can buy into that Shires. MOO Maybe Im not following.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Has anyone considered a simple question, why would Indiana spend the money to bring DN back to Indiana for a prosecution on failure to register as a sex offender (according to press reporting), if the man had left the state? Not all failures to register get prosecuted, just as not all violations of probation get people put back in jail.
They had to extradite this guy and that costs time and money. What is behind that? My suspicion is they want to keep him close.
https://www.indystar.com/story/news...year-after-slayings-abby-and-libby/326442002/
MOO, I wish LE would come out and announce that no one in the family is involved in this crime. It may be they have said something here and there but I haven't heard it. If they would announce that no one who was there that day and night, participating in the search, had anything to do with this it may produce some tips. I say this because many people believe that family is involved when a crime like this happens. If people in the community were convinced there was no family involvement they may be forced to consider some lingering doubt about someone else and report their suspicions. IMO
IMO If LE means this literally then why would anyone help them? The community is going to look at the family as suspect if nothing is said otherwise. ISP has appeared on two nationally broadcast shows with four family members. It seems they could at least announce that none of the four are POI. If not this case is hopelessly mired IMO. I know I need to hear something encouraging. I suspect there are others feeling the same way. MOOThey have said "Everybody is a POI". Incredibly unhelpful I know. Maybe we will have more info Tuesday.
Nope nothing related to Delphi at all. They had no choice but to make an example of him and strictly follow the book. All eyes on a high profile case.. of course they had to follow through.
Also, the new article referrenced is riddled with errors. The girls did not post SEVERAL photos of themselves from the trails/bridge that day, and they did not put any on FB. It was Snapchat only. Also it stated Libby took a pic of Bridge Guy as he approached them on the trails . It was on the bridge/tracks not the trails. Idk why writers cannot even get basic facts correct.