Ixchel13
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2012
- Messages
- 1,658
- Reaction score
- 1,146
Apparently I am in the minority here but I don't understand the glee at the idea that JF might be raped in prison.
I can get behind the idea of legally throwing the book at him. Giving him the harshest penalty allowed by law. Heck yeah! Lock him up for the rest of his life, if legally possible. I got no problem with that.
But hoping for, or at the very least condoning, his sexual assault in addition to his legal punishment?
I don't get it.
Even if we think criminals deserve to get back what they gave out to their victims, our legal system isn't based on that concept. Even convicted rapists aren't sentenced to being raped as their lawful punishment.
Championing or even condoning such an act seems to me the equivalent of stating that some rape victims deserve it.
And I don't believe anyone deserves to be a victim of a crime. Not even JF.
true.hooooowever, people want to see justice, vengeance,etc against the monsters who rape and kill
children. they want the worst possible punishment so maybe it will stop some of them. I thanked the posts about the footlong, but actually I'd rather see him hung on the town square.
p.s. a rape victim is innocent. A rapist is not innocent, so your analogy is not entirely correct. Because it seems like you're saying, "If a rapist deserves to be raped then a rape victim deserves to be raped."We can decide what may or may not be fair punishment for the perp, but the idea that the victim is even considered for a punishment is null.