People on social media are defending her. Even blaming the parents for letting them wait at the bus stop. What is wrong with people?
I'm not surprised. This type of attitude is common with drivers caught blowing through stopped school buses. It's never their fault, always the bus's fault for being invisible.
After this tragedy, I went through YouTube and watched hundreds of videos of people breezing through stopped school buses with their lights on and arms extended. One lady would drive down the sidewalk every morning to pass the school bus on commuter route, not only endangering students, but pedestrians, too.
Every single driver who got pulled over--and I mean every SINGLE ONE--said on camera they didn't see the bus, as if not seeing it were an excuse. My belief is when this happens, they automatically lose their license until they have a professional eye exam, because if they can't see this huge yellow object with flashing red lights in the next lane over, they can't see road signs and are they're not fit to drive.
This woman has children
This woman worked with children
This woman, at one point, either got on a school bus or went to a school and witnessed other students being dropped off at school. She didn't just crawl out from under a rock that morning and saw flashing red lights for the first time.
She knew what flashing red lights meant, regardless of what type of vehicles they were attached to. There's no way she couldn't have known or she wouldn't have been able to obtain a license. She admitted she saw the lights, but refuses to take responsibility for not acting accordingly because she didn't know what those lights were attached to. But that doesn't matter if she knew that or not. It didn't matter what those red lights were for-it could have been a flashing red light for an intersection, which means stop. It could have been for a fire truck or police car, which means use caution/pull over, ie, stop. In every state I know, regardless of what those lights are for, there's some sort of law tied to them that involves slowing down, pulling over, using caution, or stopping. She did NONE of those. There was no accident here, as her defense attorney claims. An accident would have been if the bus driver forgot to turn on the stop signals and it caught her unaware. An accident would have been if there was snow or black ice on the road, and she tried to stop, but her vehicle kept going. An accident would have been her brakes malfunctioning IF she'd tried to stop. This was no accident. An accident denotes something beyond one's control. This was a wilful act of negligence-either a flagrant disregard for the law or she getting behind the wheel while impaired with sleep deprivation, which I'm thinking is what happened, but there's no way to prove it. This was no accident, and she is no victim. Whether her intent was to harm children or not, her decisions, her wilful acts did.