ITA with lizzybeth, there is a
big difference in the way a baby cries when it's fussing itself to sleep (which I don't endorse either btw) and the sound of a child crying because it's it pain. These parents, the mother at least, should have become alarmed at the baby's crying even if they were letting her "cry it out."
The only other possibility I can think of (trying to be fair to the parents if possible) is that the baby did have some other, possibly as yet undetected, problems. The first thing that went through my head when I saw her picture was that little natalie did not look well. She did not have the appearance of a typical healthy newborn. Bless her heart poor baby. So,
IF, (a big if) something was wrong health or development wise, perhaps she did not respond or cry out like a typical infant?
Not saying this is what happened, just trying to think of all possibilities.
I have a grandaughter who is 2 months and 3 weeks old. I can say for certain that there is a difference in her cries when she is hungry as opposed to bored or having a tummy ache, etc. I cannot imagine her not screaming at the top of her lungs if she was being hurt. One shot at the Drs. office had her screaming for 15 minutes - she has quite a temper lol.
Anyway, just speculating, but I don't see how that baby, or any baby, wouldn't have cried in a way that set off alarm bells in the mother. Of course I don't know because I wasn't there. So sad. Poor little baby.
