Info/timeline of the alleged Dr. H phone calls to Shannan Gilbert's relatives

I have to agree with you there. MW was under the spell of a "gentleman pimp". She was in love.

He wanted her money!

I don't know where you heard that one?
no pimp is a gentleman

the public does NOT know the travesty of these sex traffickers.
he was not her boyfriend. he is a pathological sociopath.
a murderer.
 
I don't know where you heard that one?
no pimp is a gentleman

the public does NOT know the travesty of these sex traffickers.
he was not her boyfriend. he is a pathological sociopath.
a murderer.

Notice the "quotation" marks. I was NOT implying he was a gentleman. It is a term used to describe a man who makes his woman believe that he loves her...but really only wants what he can get from her.

A "gorilla" pimp" on the other hand, uses force to get a woman to make him money.
 
Pimps are not nice people. They are parasites. Parasites that feed off the vulnerablity of little girls. They are bottom tier. IMHO
 
Sorry to be such a ...whatever you call it in english, but this thread's topic is :

"Info/timeline of the alleged Dr. H phonecalls to SG's relatives"

So pleaaaase stay on topic :please:

My reason for beeing such a "stay on topic" nerd is that I just hate when the actual topic of a thread DROWN in posts unrelated to the original topic.
 
Pat yourself on the back. Just don't break your arm doing it.

Back on topic...sorry TF!
 
I'm speechless right now. This does not come often.

Enjoy it.

In a good way bc of TKAM.
I just found it funny is all. :)
 
Pimps are not nice people. They are parasites. Parasites that feed off the vulnerablity of little girls. They are bottom tier. IMHO

Service providers are not "little girls". They know what the score is. For the most part (obviously there are exceptions) they are doing just as much exploitation of other peoples weaknesses. After all, that is exactly what allows them to earn the living they do.
 
Sorry to be such a ...whatever you call it in english, but this thread's topic is :

"Info/timeline of the alleged Dr. H phonecalls to SG's relatives"

So pleaaaase stay on topic :please:

My reason for beeing such a "stay on topic" nerd is that I just hate when the actual topic of a thread DROWN in posts unrelated to the original topic.

:floorlaugh: That was a very polite way of explaining it and, hella funny.
 
Service providers are not "little girls". They know what the score is. For the most part (obviously there are exceptions) they are doing just as much exploitation of other peoples weaknesses. After all, that is exactly what allows them to earn the living they do.

Overall, I see prostitution as basic demand and supply. It isn't called "the oldest profession" for nuthin'. It seems that throughout time there has always been a demand and, in turn, someone to supply (for a price). Is the demand a weakness? If so, then there sure are a lot of weak individuals and have been since the get-go. With regard to pimps... I believe they exploit the weaknesses of drug-addicts and those with low self-esteem (which often go hand-in-hand). jmo

*The "morality" of prostitution... well, that could be discussed forever... and (fundamentally) it's the opinion/belief of each individual. (jmo... again)

'Dunno what to do about adding to the derailment of the thread. I'm sorry :(
 
Sorry to be such a ...whatever you call it in english, but this thread's topic is :

"Info/timeline of the alleged Dr. H phonecalls to SG's relatives"

So pleaaaase stay on topic :please:
My reason for beeing such a "stay on topic" nerd is that I just hate when the actual topic of a thread DROWN in posts unrelated to the original topic.


PLEEEEEEASE stay on TOPIC.

Please take your discussions about prostitution to this thread:

"The Adult Entertainment Industry: Case related"
 
In the Daily News today - there is an article that Katie Couric's DEAD ex-husband has a phone line in her apartment. Apparently every Tuesday morning at 2a.m. - the phone calls 911.

Police are investigating whether someone is using a device to hijack Couric’s phone and call 911, an illegal trick authorities refer to as “spoofing.”

Could Hackett's phone line's have been "spoofed"? Henceforth - that he did not really call MG? But someone else did - saying they were Hackett?

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertai...te-hubby-line-article-1.1263698#ixzz2Kt0HVhgO

Spoofing attack - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Celebrities in Los Angeles have also been victims of spoofing, in which a third party hijacks calls to a certain phone number.
In those incidents, SWAT teams were rushed to the homes of Ashton Kutcher, Tom Cruise and Charlie Sheen.

Last month, after heavily armed police responded to calls of shots fired at the mansion of Bruce and Kris Jenner, Kardashian blasted the scheme as “dangerous” on Twitter and added:“These prank calls are NOT funny!”
Authorities are looking into making this sort of hoax a felony.

And - how about if a murder is involved?
 
Perhaps I have mentioned this before:
This spoofing, in 2008, was so incredibly simple. There was a number you could call and get three free spoof calls per phone number you called from. You simply waited for the cues, put in the number that you wanted to appear on the receiving caller ID and voila'...the party answering would see the number you wanted them to see.

Someone did this to me using my home phone number...scared the livin' daylights out of me...that person thought it was hilarious. I didn't.

That service was free as long as you never used the same phone, to call from, more than three times. Then you had to be a member. There appear to be more options today.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Spo...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
 
Perhaps I have mentioned this before:
This spoofing, in 2008, was so incredibly simple. There was a number you could call and get three free spoof calls per phone number you called from. You simply waited for the cues, put in the number that you wanted to appear on the receiving caller ID and voila'...the party answering would see the number you wanted them to see.

Someone did this to me using my home phone number...scared the livin' daylights out of me...that person thought it was hilarious. I didn't.

MG was called in 2010...and technology IMPROVES by the minute!!!
so......very interesting.
 
Well something doesn't add up.
MG says CPH called her once.
MG says it was on may 1st, hours(20+/-)after she spoke with SG.
MG says CPH's call to her was, except for update calls about SG from the younger SG, the next call she received.
AD says he waited 2 days(may 2nd) before calling the younger SG to see if SG went home to them.
The younger SG and MG say the call from AD is when they hear SG is missing.
MG says AD and MP look up CPH because she told them about his call on May 1st.
While all of these things could have happened, not many of them could happen at the same time. If you look at the FACTS(CPH phone records),many of those things that were said become impossible.
Is there a "my head is spinning" smiley, that I won't use anyway?
spinning-936.gif yup there's a smilie for that. ; )
 
If you called the 866 toll free number from a burner, even Spoof Call wouldn't have been able to trace it. This group had options where you could change your voice, too.
 
Perhaps I have mentioned this before:
This spoofing, in 2008, was so incredibly simple. There was a number you could call and get three free spoof calls per phone number you called from. You simply waited for the cues, put in the number that you wanted to appear on the receiving caller ID and voila'...the party answering would see the number you wanted them to see.

Someone did this to me using my home phone number...scared the livin' daylights out of me...that person thought it was hilarious. I didn't.

That service was free as long as you never used the same phone, to call from, more than three times. Then you had to be a member. There appear to be more options today.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Spo...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Does anyone know wheter such a spoofed call would show up on the phone bill/record of the real owner of the spoofed phonumber ?
And if NOT, then on who´s phonebill/record would it show up?
 
Perhaps I have mentioned this before:
This spoofing, in 2008, was so incredibly simple. There was a number you could call and get three free spoof calls per phone number you called from. You simply waited for the cues, put in the number that you wanted to appear on the receiving caller ID and voila'...the party answering would see the number you wanted them to see.

Someone did this to me using my home phone number...scared the livin' daylights out of me...that person thought it was hilarious. I didn't.

That service was free as long as you never used the same phone, to call from, more than three times. Then you had to be a member. There appear to be more options today.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Spo...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

I remember that. It's interesting to me because I tend to agree with Downtownslim (see IT thread)that LISK is very tech savy!
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
188
Guests online
571
Total visitors
759

Forum statistics

Threads
626,021
Messages
18,515,794
Members
240,894
Latest member
jehunter
Back
Top